Article navigation

This paper considers the argument that the financial benefit (or ‘pecuniary advantage’) derived from tax evasion does not represent the proceeds of crime for the purposes of the money‐laundering legislation. The paper then considers a recent Court of Appeal case concerning an appeal against a confiscation order in relation to tax evasion, and its potential implications for those seeking to defend charges of tax‐related money laundering.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options