Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Focuses on the features of some countries that make them more likely to offer money laundering services, arguing that these tax havens are structurally different from other countries: they lack significant resources for trading internationally, which pushes them to generate income through a lax supervisory regime, yet their smallness makes them less attractive to criminal organisations. Takes a relational approach which focuses on the exchange between the centre and its criminal customers, developing a supply and demand schedule for money laundering regulation and a game structure (with mathematics) for the relationship between Offshore and Criminal. Argues that because of the complex and perverse competitive factors involved, a pure “name and shame” approach by anti‐money laundering policy makers may be counterproductive.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal