This paper introduces a modified single linkage clustering heuristic (MOD‐SC). The proposed MOD‐SLC objective is to test the application of Baroni‐Urban and Buser (BUB) similarity coefficient to the manufacturing cell formation (MCF) problem instead of Jaccard’s similarity coefficient. The MOD‐SLC has been compared and evaluated against three cluster formation‐based heuristics for MCF. The three heuristics are: the single linkage clustering, enhanced rank order clustering, and direct clustering algorithm. The MCF methods considered in this comparative and evaluative study belong to the cluster formation approach of solving the MCF problem. The comparison and evaluation are performed using four published performance measures. A total of 25 published and ten hypothetical and randomly generated problem data sets are used in the proposed evaluative study. Results analysis is carried out to test and validate the proposed BUB based MOD‐SLC. Finally the pros and cons of each method are stated and discussed.
Article navigation
1 March 2003
This article was originally published in
Integrated Manufacturing Systems
Research Article|
March 01 2003
Formation of machine groups and part families: a modified SLC method and comparative study Available to Purchase
Hassan M. Selim;
Hassan M. Selim
Department of Business Administration, College of Business and Economics, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
Search for other works by this author on:
Reda M.S. Abdel Aal;
Reda M.S. Abdel Aal
Faculty of Engineering, King Abdulaziz University, Jiddah, Saudi Arabia
Search for other works by this author on:
Araby I. Mahdi
Araby I. Mahdi
Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University, Cairo, Egypt
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-583X
Print ISSN: 0957-6061
© MCB UP Limited
2003
Integrated Manufacturing Systems (2003) 14 (2): 123–137.
Citation
Selim HM, Abdel Aal RM, Mahdi AI (2003), "Formation of machine groups and part families: a modified SLC method and comparative study". Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 14 No. 2 pp. 123–137, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09576060310459429
Download citation file:
347
Views
Suggested Reading
Resources. Focus on facilitation
Journal of Managerial Psychology (November,1999)
The KAI as a Survey‐feedback Instrument
Journal of European Industrial Training (June,1990)
Measuring the Impact of Sponsorship
International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship (September,1999)
The “ideal” team compensation system ‐ an overview: Part I
Team Performance Management: An International Journal (August,1998)
The successful salesman: a personality analysis
European Journal of Marketing (January,1968)
Related Chapters
Concluding Remarks Setting the Scene: The Calculus of Agreement in Group Negotiation
Negotiation and Groups
Scenes from a Power Struggle: The Rise of Retail Investors in the US Stock Market
Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets
Chapter 1 When are Teams an Asset in Negotiations and when are they a Liability?
Negotiation and Groups
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
