The mission of any public infrastructure and construction (PIC) projects is to improve the well-being of the society. In spite of this, as some of these projects might impact on the environment and affect the habitat of local residents, it is not unusual to attract criticism or even opposition from various stakeholder groups. Consequently, there is an increasing concern about the effectiveness of public participation for PIC projects. The authors strive to examine the salient elements of public participation by considering the questions of ‘who’, ‘what’ and ‘how’ in the process. The paper begins by reviewing the international public participation practices and the models proposed by various researchers. The key aspects to be considered during the public participation process are then highlighted. The paper concludes by proposing a comprehensive participatory framework for PIC projects, especially those of a highly sensitive nature. The results show that the standpoints of various stakeholders can be rather diverse and it is necessary to ensure a consensus is reached at different project stages through a well-planned, whole-cycle participatory exercise in order to maximise the chance of project success. More importantly, better acceptance towards other views and more education on the importance of public participation are needed to ensure that society benefits from economic and social development without sacrificing the rights and best interests of the minority groups.
Article navigation
June 2012
Research Article|
June 01 2012
Rethinking public participation in infrastructure projects
S Thomas Ng, MSc, PhD, FRICS, MCIOB, MAPM, FHKIS, FHKICM, MHKIPM, RPS(QS);
S Thomas Ng, MSc, PhD, FRICS, MCIOB, MAPM, FHKIS, FHKICM, MHKIPM, RPS(QS)
1
Associate Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Search for other works by this author on:
Terry H. Y. Li, MSc;
Terry H. Y. Li, MSc
2
PhD candidate, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Search for other works by this author on:
James M. W. Wong, BSc, PhD
James M. W. Wong, BSc, PhD
3
Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Civil Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
April 28 2011
Accepted:
September 15 2011
Online ISSN: 1751-7699
Print ISSN: 0965-0903
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2012
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer (2012) 165 (2): 101–113.
Article history
Received:
April 28 2011
Accepted:
September 15 2011
Citation
Ng ST, Li THY, Wong JMW (2012), "Rethinking public participation in infrastructure projects". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer, Vol. 165 No. 2 pp. 101–113, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/muen.11.00027
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Social value for whom, by whom and when? Managing stakeholder dynamics in a UK megaproject
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law (February,2020)
Stumbling blocks on the Hydrogen road in Norway
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (December,2010)
Briefing: Learning from Europe
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (June,2009)
Achieving inclusive design: consultation with disabled people
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer (October,2014)
Using heritage in regeneration: the role of museums
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer (September,2010)
Related Chapters
Infrastructure digital technology requires systems-thinking
Doing it Differently: Systems for rethinking infrastructure
The subsurface as the final urban frontier
Underground Spaces Unveiled: Planning and creating the cities of the future
The value-based decision-making process: An overview
Whole-Life Value-Based Decision-Making in Asset Management
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
