The USA Patriot Act and its implementing regulations required mutual funds to implement anti‐money laundering (AML) programs by July 24, 2002. This legislation, which substantially amended the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), no doubt will have the most far‐reaching affect on the fund industry since the Investment Company Act was adopted in 1940. It also will present new challenges to fund legal counsel and compliance personnel. Until the Patriot Act was signed into law, the regulatory framework for funds generally focused on protecting investors through mandatory disclosure obligations and self‐dealing prohibitions. AML programs add a new focus. An AML program must be designed to, among other things, prevent a fund from being used for money laundering or the financing of terrorist activities. While banks have had AML programs for several decades, these requirements are uncharted waters for mutual funds, as well as for most other securities firms.
Article navigation
1 April 2002
Review Article|
April 01 2002
Anti‐money laundering compliance for the mutual fund industry
Robert A. Robertson;
Robert A. Robertson
Dechert, Newport Beach, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Monique S. Delhomme
Monique S. Delhomme
Dechert, Newport Beach, CA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7476
Print ISSN: 1528-5812
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Journal of Investment Compliance (2002) 3 (2): 31–39.
Citation
Robertson RA, Delhomme MS (2002), "Anti‐money laundering compliance for the mutual fund industry". Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 31–39, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/joic.2002.3.2.31
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Investment adviser: Failure of duty to supervise
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
How much (and how conflicted) is that portfolio manager in the window? Implications of the SEC proposed rule on enhanced portfolio management disclosure for registered investment companies
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The Use of fraud examiners in the battle against occupational fraud and abuse
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The Benefits and potential pitfalls of cooperating with regulatory agencies and the government: How to navigate the minefield
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The independence of financial analysts: evaluation of an alternative proposal
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2003)
Related Chapters
The Discretionary Accrual in the Financial Statement of a Public Company in Indonesia: A Literature Review
Proceedings of MICoMS 2017
Placemaking: Creating Value With Smart Spaces
Placemaking: People, Properties, Planning
Do Investment Funds Care About the Environment? Evidence from Faith-based Funds
New Challenges for Future Sustainability and Wellbeing
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
