Part I of this series appeared in the Summer 2002 issue of The Journal of Investment Compliance. It addressed the regulation of wrap fee programs under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company Act”) and the requirements of Rule 3a‐4 thereunder, which must be met so that a wrap fee program is not deemed to be an investment company. Part I also discussed certain issues arising under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”), including how program sponsors and any third‐party portfolio managers generally are viewed as investment advisers and are subject to the Advisers Act. Part II discusses additional Advisers Act issues such as suitability, fees, and advertising. It also briefly reviews issues arising under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). The information provided in Part II assumes that readers have some basic familiarity with Part I.
Article navigation
1 April 2002
Review Article|
April 01 2002
The regulation of wrap fee programs – Part II
Terrance J. O’Malley;
Terrance J. O’Malley
Investment Management Group at LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP
Search for other works by this author on:
Kenneth E. Neikirk
Kenneth E. Neikirk
Investment Management Group at LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, LLP
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7476
Print ISSN: 1528-5812
© MCB UP Limited
2002
Journal of Investment Compliance (2002) 3 (2): 44–57.
Citation
O’Malley TJ, Neikirk KE (2002), "The regulation of wrap fee programs – Part II". Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 44–57, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/joic.2002.3.2.44
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Investment adviser: Failure of duty to supervise
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
How much (and how conflicted) is that portfolio manager in the window? Implications of the SEC proposed rule on enhanced portfolio management disclosure for registered investment companies
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The Use of fraud examiners in the battle against occupational fraud and abuse
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The Benefits and potential pitfalls of cooperating with regulatory agencies and the government: How to navigate the minefield
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The independence of financial analysts: evaluation of an alternative proposal
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2003)
Related Chapters
The Discretionary Accrual in the Financial Statement of a Public Company in Indonesia: A Literature Review
Proceedings of MICoMS 2017
Placemaking: Creating Value With Smart Spaces
Placemaking: People, Properties, Planning
Do Investment Funds Care About the Environment? Evidence from Faith-based Funds
New Challenges for Future Sustainability and Wellbeing
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
