Riggs Bank N.A. of Washington, DC entered into a consent order with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency in July 2003, received a cease and desist order from the Federal Reserve Board later that year, and was assessed a $25 million penalty by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) in May 2004, all for Bank Secrecy Act violations. In general, Riggs was deficient (i) in designing a program tailored to the risks of its business that would ensure appropriate reporting, (ii) in implementing the procedures it did have, and (iii) in responding to classic “red flags” of suspicious conduct. As a result, Riggs failed to file a number of timely and complete suspicious activity reports (SARs) and late and complete currency transaction reports (CTRs) for high‐risk accounts. In discussing the violations that occurred, FinCEN articulated internal control, customer due diligence, compliance monitoring, and independent testing standards that Riggs did not meet, and that other institutions should regard as rules of general applicability.
Article navigation
1 April 2004
Viewpoint|
April 01 2004
Riggs order articulates bank secrecy act compliance requirements
Paul S Pilecki;
Paul S Pilecki
Partner, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, USA;ppilecki@winston.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Michael A. Mancusi
Michael A. Mancusi
Associate, Winston & Strawn LLP, Washington, DC, USA; mmancus@winston.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7476
Print ISSN: 1528-5812
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Journal of Investment Compliance (2004) 5 (2): 85–86.
Citation
Pilecki PS, Mancusi MA (2004), "Riggs order articulates bank secrecy act compliance requirements". Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 5 No. 2 pp. 85–86, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810410636226
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Investment adviser: Failure of duty to supervise
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
How much (and how conflicted) is that portfolio manager in the window? Implications of the SEC proposed rule on enhanced portfolio management disclosure for registered investment companies
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The Use of fraud examiners in the battle against occupational fraud and abuse
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The Benefits and potential pitfalls of cooperating with regulatory agencies and the government: How to navigate the minefield
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
The independence of financial analysts: evaluation of an alternative proposal
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2003)
Related Chapters
Green Bonds as Catalysts for Sustainable Development: Strategies and Implications for India
Green Technologies and Sustainable Development: Coherent Strategies for Developing Countries
Budget Investments in Russia: Not Investment but Transformation of Public Property
The Spread of Financial Sophistication through Emerging Markets Worldwide
Innovation Policy in an Interacted World – The Critical Role of the Context
No Business is an Island: Making Sense of the Interactive Business World
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
