Every month, many hedge fund managers grapple with a fundamental conflict of interest. The conflict arises when a fund manager, whose compensation is based on fund performance, is charged with determining the value of the complex or illiquid securities in his portfolio. These securities often do not receive reliable market quotes, and may be difficult to value. Accordingly, a fund manager may be tempted to misprice the hard‐to‐price names in his account in order to bolster fund performance, and increase his own compensation. The situation is somewhat analogous to a chief financial officer calculating his corporation’s profits, all the while knowing that his calculations will affect his bonus. Change, however, is on the horizon. On December 2, 2004, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission)” amended the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act)” to require certain hedge fund advisers to register with the Commission (the “Rule)”. Under the Rule, registered hedge fund advisers will be required to make their books available to SEC examiners by February 1, 2006, and, in turn, subject their valuation methods and policies to regulatory scrutiny.
Article navigation
1 October 2004
Viewpoint|
October 01 2004
How much is that security worth? Valuation issues and recommendations for hedge fund advisers post‐registration
Derek M. Meisner
Derek M. Meisner
Of Counsel, Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham, LLP, Boson, MA, USA; dmeisner@klng.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7476
Print ISSN: 1528-5812
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2005
Journal of Investment Compliance (2004) 5 (4): 36–39.
Citation
Meisner DM (2004), "How much is that security worth? Valuation issues and recommendations for hedge fund advisers post‐registration". Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 5 No. 4 pp. 36–39, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810410636604
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Making the most of an internal investigation
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
KPMG Survey: Banks accept more costly money‐laundering laws, expect heightened cooperation with regulators
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
Short sales: New rules and recent enforcement actions
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
Broker‐dealer customer complaints
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
Model compliance: Avoiding the hard‐knocks life so the sun will Come out tomorrow
Journal of Investment Compliance (July,2004)
Related Chapters
Green Bonds as Catalysts for Sustainable Development: Strategies and Implications for India
Green Technologies and Sustainable Development: Coherent Strategies for Developing Countries
Budget Investments in Russia: Not Investment but Transformation of Public Property
The Spread of Financial Sophistication through Emerging Markets Worldwide
Innovation Policy in an Interacted World – The Critical Role of the Context
No Business is an Island: Making Sense of the Interactive Business World
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
