The Trade‐through rule (TTR) was established in 1975; it was designed to ensure that investors got the best price available for a stock trade. Under the Trade‐through rule, a customer’s order must be routed to the exchange or order market system where the best current price exists at any given moment. For example, if the best price quote for an order is listed by a specialist market maker at the NYSE, a customer order must be routed to the NYSE floor; it may not “trade through” to another exchange. The TTR is really an anti‐trade‐through rule; i.e. it prevents the trading through of orders. In fact, to reflect this reality, the SEC has given the TTR a new name: The Order Protection Rule. In concept, the TTR is a good idea to ensure that investors get the best price possible when trading stocks. At the time the TTR was adopted, it was designed to address a fragmented marketplace for stock trading. However, the financial markets have changed radically since the rule was first adopted. The dramatic increase in the use of personal computers in the early 1980s as well as the advent of electronic communication networks (ECNs) in the 1990s changed the trading landscape.
Article navigation
1 October 2004
Viewpoint|
October 01 2004
Opting out of the “opt‐out” provision: The new order protection rule from the SEC
Mark Anson
Mark Anson
Chief Investment Officer, CalPERS, Sacramento, CA, USA; mark@calpers.ca.gov
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7476
Print ISSN: 1528-5812
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2005
Journal of Investment Compliance (2004) 5 (4): 60–66.
Citation
Anson M (2004), "Opting out of the “opt‐out” provision: The new order protection rule from the SEC". Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 5 No. 4 pp. 60–66, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810410636569
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
What to do when the government calls
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Preventing computer fraud means outwitting a horde of hackers, crackers, spoofers, and sniffers
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Enhancing the value of fairness opinions: Limiting risk in the post‐enron era
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Investment company director responsibilities in the wake of recent regulatory action
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Transaction costs and best execution: Compliance and measurement
Journal of Investment Compliance (January,2004)
Related Chapters
Green Bonds as Catalysts for Sustainable Development: Strategies and Implications for India
Green Technologies and Sustainable Development: Coherent Strategies for Developing Countries
Budget Investments in Russia: Not Investment but Transformation of Public Property
The Spread of Financial Sophistication through Emerging Markets Worldwide
Innovation Policy in an Interacted World – The Critical Role of the Context
No Business is an Island: Making Sense of the Interactive Business World
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
