On October 26, 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”) adopted a new rule and related amendments requiring, among other things, that hedge fund managers register with the SEC under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”) by February 1, 2006. In this article, we refer to the totality of the recent rulemaking as the “new rules.” The new rules and a lengthy interpretive release (the “Adopting Release”) were made available to the public on December 2, 2004.The new rules only slightly modify the text of the proposed rules published by the SEC on July 20, 2004. We will refer to the July 20, 2004 rules as the “proposed rules.” The proposed rules, which were opposed by two of the five SEC commissioners at the time they were announced, provoked a loud outcry and strong opposition. According to the Adopting Release, the SEC received 161 comment letters from investors, hedge fund managers, mutual fund managers, law firms, and others. Of these, only 36 supported the proposed rules, 83 argued against them, and the remainder presented a neutral view. The objections included “concerns about the costs of compliance under the new rule[s], questions about [SEC] effectiveness in preventing hedge fund fraud, and the potential intrusiveness of [SEC] oversight of hedge fund managers.”
Article navigation
1 October 2004
Review Article|
October 01 2004
Hedge fund managers: Summary and implications of new rules requiring SEC registration
Carolyn E. Taylor
Carolyn E. Taylor
Partner, Covington & Burling, New York, USA;ctaylor@cov.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7476
Print ISSN: 1528-5812
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2005
Journal of Investment Compliance (2004) 5 (4): 9–17.
Citation
Taylor CE (2004), "Hedge fund managers: Summary and implications of new rules requiring SEC registration". Journal of Investment Compliance, Vol. 5 No. 4 pp. 9–17, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/15285810410636640
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
What to do when the government calls
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Preventing computer fraud means outwitting a horde of hackers, crackers, spoofers, and sniffers
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Enhancing the value of fairness opinions: Limiting risk in the post‐enron era
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Investment company director responsibilities in the wake of recent regulatory action
Journal of Investment Compliance (April,2004)
Transaction costs and best execution: Compliance and measurement
Journal of Investment Compliance (January,2004)
Related Chapters
Innovation Policy in an Interacted World – The Critical Role of the Context
No Business is an Island: Making Sense of the Interactive Business World
Budget Investments in Russia: Not Investment but Transformation of Public Property
The Spread of Financial Sophistication through Emerging Markets Worldwide
Green Bonds as Catalysts for Sustainable Development: Strategies and Implications for India
Green Technologies and Sustainable Development: Coherent Strategies for Developing Countries
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
