Provision on framework agreements has been introduced into European Union (EU) Law in 2004. Since then framework agreements have gained popularity and importance on the European Union (EU) public tender market. Nevertheless, the use of frameworks poses significant legal challenges necessitating the clarification of the governing rules and the introduction of further guidelines. Unfortunately, clarifications were not fully provided in the new Directive 2014/24/EU. This article is a study of legal loopholes and uncertainties that occur during public procurement of framework agreements as a result of current EU rules and national practices in Denmark and the United Kingdom. The article highlights the need for clarification of the existing rules and introduction of transparency to the subsequent call-off stage of framework agreements. To achieve study aims, three methods were applied: a doctrinal analysis, a small scale comparative law research and field research based on qualitative research by the means of semi-structured interviews.
Article navigation
1 April 2017
Research Article|
April 01 2017
Dealing with legal loopholes and uncertainties within eu public procurement law regarding framework agreements Available to Purchase
Marta Andrecka
Marta Andrecka
Centre for Enterprise Liability, Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2150-6930
Print ISSN: 1535-0118
Copyright © 2016 by PrAcademics Press
2016
licensed reuse rights only
Journal of Public Procurement (2017) 16 (4): 505–527.
Citation
Andrecka M (2017), "Dealing with legal loopholes and uncertainties within eu public procurement law regarding framework agreements". Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 16 No. 4 pp. 505–527, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-16-04-2016-B004
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Peer review effectiveness: An analysis of potential loopholes within the USA Peer Review Program
Managerial Auditing Journal (January,2006)
North Korea sanctions will pinch, but leave loopholes
Expert Briefings (March,2016)
Living hours under pressure: flexibility loopholes in the Danish IR-model
Employee Relations: The International Journal (October,2017)
Identity theft fraud- major loophole for FinTech industry in India
Journal of Financial Crime (November,2022)
Air Qiaodan: An examination of transliteration and trademark squatting in China based on Jordan vs Qiaodan Sports
International Journal of Sports Marketing and Sponsorship (February,2017)
Related Chapters
“$40 to Make Sure”: Background Check Laws and the Endogenous Construction of Criminal Risk
After Imprisonment: Special Issue
Chapter 8 A Tale of Two Policies: California Programs that Unintentionally Promote Development in Wildland Fire Hazard Zones
Living on the Edge
Legislative Scandals in the United States
Corruption, Accountability and Discretion
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
