Federal agencies are relying increasingly on contractors to perform their missions. With hundreds of billions of tax dollars spent each year on goods and services, it is essential that federal acquisition be handled in an efficient, effective, and accountable manner. The Government Accountability Office (GAO), however--as well as other accountability organizations, inspectors general, and the agencies themselves--continue to identify systemic weaknesses in key areas of acquisition. In fact, the acquisition function at several agencies has been on GAO's high-risk list, which identifies areas in the federal government with greater vulnerability to fraud, waste, abuse, and mismanagement. In January 2005, we added interagency contracting to this list. Far too often, the result of poor acquisitions has been an inability to obtain quality goods and services on time and at a fair price. We can no longer afford such outcomes. Given current fiscal demands and the fiscal challenges we are likely to face in the 21st century, the federal government must improve its ability to acquire goods and services in a cost-effective manner. GAO developed this framework to enable high-level, qualitative assessments of the strengths and weaknesses of the acquisition function at federal agencies. Such assessments can help senior agency executives identify areas needing greater management attention, and enable accountability organizations (including GAO) to identify areas requiring more focused follow-up work. The framework consists of four interrelated cornerstones that our work has shown are essential to an efficient, effective, and accountable acquisition process: (1) organizational alignment and leadership, (2) policies and processes, (3) human capital, and (4) knowledge and information management. The framework supports an integrated evaluation approach, but each of these cornerstones can stand alone so users of this framework may tailor evaluations to an agency's specific needs.
Article navigation
1 March 2006
Research Article|
March 01 2006
Framework for assessing the acquisition function at federal agencies
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2150-6930
Print ISSN: 1535-0118
Copyright © 2006 by PrAcademics Press
2006
licensed reuse rights only
Journal of Public Procurement (2006) 6 (1-2): 131–176.
Citation
(2006), "Framework for assessing the acquisition function at federal agencies". Journal of Public Procurement, Vol. 6 No. 1-2 pp. 131–176, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JOPP-06-01-02-2006-B006
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Federal contracting: guidance on award fees has led to better practices but is not consistently applied
Journal of Public Procurement (March,2009)
Constructing legal authority to facilitate multi-level interagency health data sharing in the United States
International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Healthcare Marketing (June,2015)
Highlights of a gao forum: Federal acquisition challenges and opportunities in the 21st century
Journal of Public Procurement (March,2007)
A must for agencies or a candidate for deletion: A grounded theory investigation of the relationships between records management and information security
Records Management Journal (January,2019)
US interagency law enforcement cooperation since September 11, 2001: Improvements and results
Journal of Financial Crime (May,2007)
Related Chapters
Young English Language Learners as Listeners: Theoretical Perspectives, Research Strands, and Implications for Instruction
Contemporary Perspectives on Language and Cultural Diversity in Early Childhood Education
CIRCLES: A Three-Team Interagency Collaboration Approach to Support Successful Transitions for Students with Disabilities
Transition Programs for Children and Youth with Diverse Needs
Chapter 1 Early identification/intervention: The Earlier the better for students with disabilities
Current Issues and Trends in Special Education: Identification, Assessment and Instruction
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
