Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

Approaches taken by states in their revenue forecasting are extremely diverse. This research identifies six institutional structures that states utilize in their revenue forecasting processes. The results show that the “typical” state utilizes a non-consensual approach to forecast formulation with the forecast being done by a single executive agency or cabinet office and with the executive having the final say in the forecast. The “typical” state will not have an economic advisory council, but will utilize faculty from local universities. The “typical” state updates its forecast about every six months and the forecasters perceive their forecast as binding the state budget.

This content is only available via PDF.
licensed reuse rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal