Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This study aims to determine whether 100% employee-owned firms perform better than other firms for federal customers in public procurement.

Design/methodology/approach

The study utilized a large, comprehensive, but rarely leveraged data set: the ratings of contractor performance by federal procurement officials in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

Findings

Statistical analysis of CPARS scores indicates that 100% employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) firms achieve higher ratings than all other firms and at a significance level well beyond 99%. In particular, they more frequently achieve ratings in CPARS of excellent or very good than other firms.

Practical implications

The findings suggest that federal contracting officials can confidently develop business relationships with many 100% ESOP firms.

Originality/value

Very few studies of public procurement in the United States have leveraged the data of the federal Contractor Performance Assessment Report Systems (CPARS).

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal