Skip to Main Content
Article navigation

On behalf of the editorial panel of the International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, welcome to the second themed issue of the journal devoted to the 8th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, which took place at the University of Western Australia in January 2014.

Whereas the first such issue (volume 15, issue 1) presented full-length versions of some of the award-winning papers from the conference (Garzón et al., 2015; Loli et al., 2015; Phillips and Chi, 2015) along with an article on pioneers of centrifuge modelling (Craig et al., 2015), this issue will present a number of shorter session reports summarising the contributions made at the conference to the state of the art of physical modelling in a number of key areas. These include areas of general interest

and also ones themed around geotechnical engineering applications

The former, general interest papers provide a broad overview, discussing recent developments in the modelling of challenging geomechanical problems, such as those involving dynamic soil behaviour or unsaturated soil. Contemporary geotechnical physical modelling generally involves conducting low volumes of increasingly complex tests to achieve ever-more realism in the geotechnical processes that can be modelled. Read together, there is an emerging theme from these two papers of how realistic one could or should be in physical modelling and the related issues of soil variability and characterisation of fundamental soil properties within tests.

In terms of the application-driven contributions, it will be no surprise that foundations were a popular topic. As outlined by Reul (2015), foundations papers focussed heavily on the application of physical modelling to reducing the uncertainties associated with deep foundation types (e.g. as outlined by Randolph (2003)) under various loading regimes. There were also healthy contributions in other perennial geotechnical areas, and the reviews by Bezuijen (2015) and Kitazume (2015) also echo the issues mentioned previously regarding the level of realism that could/should be modelled – that is, whether the aim is to model a specific prototype, or whether the physical modelling is used as an experiment in its own right. The topic of geohazards included within the paper by Kitazume (2015) naturally leads on to a more in-depth review of one of the most significant of natural hazards, namely earthquakes (Madabhushi, 2015). This area has grown significantly in recent years as highly sophisticated earthquake actuators have been developed and deployed more widely around the world. An emerging theme from this area is an increasing need for physical modelling to contribute to enhancing the resilience of vulnerable structural/foundation systems, as indicated by the aftermath of recent earthquakes in New Zealand, Japan and Nepal since 2010. Offshore geotechnics is becoming an ever-more popular area of geotechnical physical modelling, as we move into deeper water and more challenging environments (e.g. polar areas) to extract oil and gas, and install increasing amounts of renewable energy capacity offshore. It is not surprising, therefore, especially given the conference's location, that offshore geotechnics was a popular area and O'Loughlin (2015) presents a highly detailed review of the work presented, which was strongly informed by current and future industry challenges.

We hope that this collection of articles will be useful both as a concise summary of the updates to the state of the art in geotechnical physical modelling (particularly for members of the community who were unable to attend the conference in person) and also as useful references for future physical modelling studies and state-of-the-art reviews. Full versions of all of the conference papers discussed can of course be found in the conference proceedings (Gaudin and White, 2014).

On behalf of the editorial panel I would like to take this opportunity to thank Prof. Christophe Gaudin for conceiving the idea of these themed issues, for coordinating their compilation and for writing the editorial for the first themed issue (Gaudin, 2015). This was a huge amount of additional work, over and above that associated with organising the conference, for which the editorial panel and I are immensely grateful. We would also like to thank CRC Press for their assistance in reproducing figures within the session reports.

Finally, I would like to draw your attention to the next themed issue (in 2016) on ‘Advanced use of image analysis in physical modelling’. I would encourage all members of the community who use image analysis in their physical modelling to submit a paper for consideration. The call for papers can be found on the ICE Virtual Library website (http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/upload/ijpmgPIV.pdf); abstracts should be submitted to the Journals Development Editor, Dr Alison McAnena, by 30 June 2015.

Graphic. Refer to the image caption for details.

Bezuijen
A
.
Session report: dams, embankments and slope stability
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
80
84
, .
Craig
WH
,
Vinogradov
VV
,
Frolovsky
YK
,
Zaytsev
AA
.
Pioneers of centrifuge modelling
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
1
):
3
18
, .
Garzón
LX
,
Caicedo
B
,
Sánchez-Silva
M
,
Phoon
KK
.
Physical modelling of soil uncertainty
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
1
):
19
34
, .
Gaudin
C
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
1
):
1
2
, Editorial .
Gaudin
C
,
White
DJ
.
ICPMG2014 – Physical Modelling in Geotechnics: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2014
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL, USA
.
Kitazume
M
.
Session report: ground improvements, reinforcements and geohazards
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
85
90
, .
Lee
F
.
Session report: similitude, scaling and education
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
60
63
, .
Loli
M
,
Knappett
JA
,
Anastasopoulos
I
,
Brown
MJ
.
Use of Ricker motions as an alternative to pushover testing
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
1
):
44
55
, .
Madabhushi
SPG
.
Session report: physical modelling in geotechnical earthquake engineering
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
91
97
, .
O'Loughlin
CD
.
Session report: offshore geotechnics at ICPMG 2014
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
98
115
, .
Phillips
R
,
Chi
K
.
Modelling ice rubble–rock berm interaction
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
1
):
35
43
, .
Randolph
MF
.
Science and empiricism in pile foundation design
.
Géotechnique
,
2003
,
53
, (
10
):
847
875
, .
Reul
O
.
Session report: shallow and deep foundations
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
69
79
, .
Sasanakul
I
,
Abdoun
T
.
Session report: physical modelling studies of soil properties and soil behaviour
.
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics
,
2015
,
15
, (
2
):
64
68
, .

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal