Update search
Filter
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Journal
Type
Issue Section
Date
Availability
1-12 of 12
Keywords: physical modelling
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Eva Khamis, Matthieu Blanc, Thierry Dubreucq, Jean de Sauvage, Thibault Badinier, Jean-Michel Pereira
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics 1–15.
Published: 28 July 2026
...) is studied at 26.7g using physical modelling, representing a 16 m long pile at prototype scale. The pile model is subjected to a horizontal load of 430 kN followed by six heating-cooling cycles resulting in an approximate 2% increase in lateral displacement under Δ T ≈ 1°C. Temperatures...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2026) 26 (4): 203–224.
Published: 07 May 2026
...Harshal Verma; Bappaditya Manna; Partha Narayan Mishra; David Williams This study offers insights on the possibility of using coal mine overburden as backfill material for the mechanically stabilised earth ( MSE ) wall through the physical model tests. The paper presents 1 g model tests of an MSE...
Journal Articles
A. Mertz, PhD, DiplEng, A. Ajami, MSc, C. Dano, PhD, DiplEng, F. Emeriault, PhD, DiplEng, O. Jenck, PhD, DiplEng, C. Fernandez, PhD, DiplEng, A. Lebrun, PhD, DiplEng, M. Polo, DiplEng
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2025) 25 (4): 219–238.
Published: 22 April 2025
...) . 24 09 2024 25 02 2025 Emerald Publishing Limited: All rights reserved 2025 buried structures gas transportation pipelines geotechnical engineering model tests physical modelling pipes and pipelines soil-structure interaction A length of the trench (Fascicule...
Journal Articles
J. H. Mazutti, BEng, MSc, PhD, B. Bienen, BEng, Dipl-Ing, PhD, M. F. Bransby, MA, PhD, M. F. Randolph, MA, PhD, FAA, FRE, G. Wager, PhD
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2025) 25 (1): 34–48.
Published: 13 January 2025
... to improving the understanding of vibro-driving mechanisms and thereby improve future engineering predictions. 01 10 2023 24 08 2024 Emerald Publishing Limited: All rights reserved 2025 foundations geotechnical centrifuge modelling monopiles offshore engineering physical modelling...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2025) 25 (3): 177–193.
Published: 09 January 2025
... retaining walls. A variety of physical modellings have been performed to evaluate the traditional theories validation as well as investigate the earth pressure distributions on retaining walls under either completely dry or fully saturated conditions (Barros, 2006 ; Benmebarek et al., 2006 ; Cao...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2006) 6 (2): 01–13.
Published: 01 June 2006
... between the physical model test results and the simulations are discussed trying to identify the cause of the discrepancy when a discrepancy may have been observed and suggest improved procedures for parameter determination. However, in conclusion, the comparison generally shows good agreement...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2005) 5 (2): 31–48.
Published: 01 June 2005
.... General experimental aims are discussed, and aspects of the structural and geotechnical scaling are considered in detail. Some example results from a monotonic pushover test are presented to illustrate the capabilities of the system. physical modelling three-legged jack-up clay spudcan footings...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2004) 4 (2): 13–26.
Published: 01 June 2004
... Thomas Telford and ICE 2004 retaining wall centrifuge physical modelling robot sand footing soil-structure interaction excavation ...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2003) 3 (2): 11–22.
Published: 01 June 2003
... of the influence of deposit thickness. It is found that increasing the deposit thickness increases Hl, DH and S. physical modelling centrifuge liquefaction earthquake lateral spreading overconsolidation 23 12 2002 © Thomas Telford and ICE 2003 ...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2001) 1 (3): 17–26.
Published: 01 September 2001
... was compared with independent estimates from oedometer tests. The tests gave very encouraging results, with the potential for the value of cv to be estimated within an error band of ±20%. physical modelling centrifuge shear strength T-bar penetration test plate penetration test twitch test...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2001) 1 (2): 29–41.
Published: 01 June 2001
...Michael O’Neill; Mark Randolph The design of large offshore drag anchors remains relatively primitive, relying on design charts that cover broad categories of soil type, and with no direct link to specific shear strength profiles at a given site. Physical modeling offers one way to improve...
Journal Articles
International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics (2001) 1 (1): 1–8.
Published: 01 March 2001
...M. F. Randolph; A. R. House Physical modelling in geotechnical engineering is used extensively, in spite of the high investment costs for experimental facilities and the contrasting decline in computing costs. The paper discusses why physical modelling is still needed, and the manner in which...
