This paper investigates whether Large Language Models (LLMs), guided by prompt engineering, can automate the complex Discourse Quality Index (DQI) for measuring deliberative quality. Evaluating state-of-the-art models from OpenAI and Google by varying In-Context Learning (ICL) examples (0–50) shows LLMs achieve high fidelity, comparable to human annotators based on standard reliability metrics. Performance improves markedly with few examples, plateauing around 25–50 examples. While both models perform well, differences highlight the interplay between model selection and ICL strategy. Error analysis identifies specific DQI dimensions requiring further improvement, suggesting future work on advanced reasoning prompts. This study confirms LLM viability for scaling DQI measurement and provides practical guidance on optimizing ICL strategies. Additionally, it contributes a modular, adaptable AI engineering pipeline that researchers can leverage for their own prompting experiments across various measurement tasks.
Article navigation
1 October 2025
Research Article|
October 01 2025
Towards Qualitative Measurement at Scale: A Prompt-Engineering Framework for Large-Scale Analysis of Deliberative Quality in Parliamentary Debates
Mitchell Bosley
Mitchell Bosley
Postdoctoral Researcher, Centro Nacional de Investigación en Inteligencia Artifical (CENIA)
Chile
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 2689-4823
Print ISSN: 2689-4815
© 2025 M. Bosley
2025
M. Bosley
Licensed re-use rights only
Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy (2025) 6 (3-4): 355–383.
Citation
Bosley M (2025), "Towards Qualitative Measurement at Scale: A Prompt-Engineering Framework for Large-Scale Analysis of Deliberative Quality in Parliamentary Debates". Journal of Political Institutions and Political Economy, Vol. 6 No. 3-4 pp. 355–383, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/113.00000128
Download citation file:
25
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Cautions in using ChatGPT for qualitative thematic analysis: the case of social support in an internet forum for patients
Qualitative Research Journal (March,2026)
Ethical opportunities and risks of using ChatGPT for open science: evidence from a three-year mixed-methods study
Journal of Ethics in
Entrepreneurship and Technology (July,2026)
Artificial research participants in behavioral science
Journal of Ethics in
Entrepreneurship and Technology (December,2025)
Human intelligence versus artificial intelligence in classifying economics research articles: exploratory evidence
Journal of Documentation (December,2024)
Designing an artificial intelligence-enabled large language model for financial decisions
Management Decision (January,2025)
Related Chapters
Role of Emerging Technologies in Indigenous Emancipation: A Systematic Literature Review
Reviewing the Latest Trends in Management Literature, Volume 4B
Artificial Intelligence
Artificial Intelligence, ESG Investments and the Future of Tokenized Assets
Artificial Intelligence and Bias Towards Marginalised Groups: Theoretical Roots and Challenges
AI and Diversity in a Datafied World of Work: Will the Future of Work be Inclusive?
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
