This paper aims to present narrative experiences of conflict management in two condominiums in South India. Using narrative experiences, theorisation of condominiums as moral economies is developed.
Two of these condominiums selected are from South India, and their conflicts have been settled without approaching courts and legal channels. The general body meetings of condominiums are attended to identify friction points between members. These friction points are discussed in in-depth interviews with Resident Welfare Association (RWA) office bearers and residents.
The authors use the two cases to conclude that migrants typically living in condominiums experience in-betweenness of property enjoyment. Being multi-ethnic communities, members associate with ethnic affiliations, creating multiple publics within condominiums. This poses an additional challenge to resolve conflicts. Self-governing mechanisms to advance value addition from collective living necessitates a moral economy decision-making. As a result, the legal approach of upholding the case of one party over the other does not follow the logic of in-betweenness.
Property enjoyment as a category to understand the nature of conflict in condominiums is brought out. The element of property enjoyment is a transformative experience of in-betweenness of private and collective property holding.
Municipal authorities should incorporate principles of self-governing of semi-commons into by-laws of condominiums.
Better societal arrangement through multi-identity community living.
Descriptive reporting of conflicts within RWAs in India is being done for the first time. There is hardly any literature on the moral economy and in-betweenness of property experience.
