Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

New regulatory initiatives, principally MiFID and RegNMS, challenge wholesale financial firms to prove that they can provide best execution for their clients. This article aims to outline the background to the problem and suggest that current research into SVM/DAPR applications may provide a practical approach.

Design/methodology/approach

The article presents a desk review of current issues in “best execution” based on work with European brokers and others, followed by initial, promising trial of SVM/DAPR.

Findings

The article finds that brokers need automated tools, e.g. “sifting engines” that help them to focus compliance efforts on anomalous trades.

Research limitations/implications

Although brokers appear to need assistance in identifying anomalous trades, whether they place significant effort in compliance depends on regulatory enforcement.

Originality/value

MiFID and RegNMS will require changes in current practice. SVM/DAPR approaches appear to be worth further investigation.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal