Many of the principal concepts that underpin current metallic structural design codes were developed on the basis of bilinear (elastic, perfectly-plastic) material behaviour; such material behaviour lends itself to the concept of section classification. The continuous strength method represents an alternative treatment to cross-section classification, which is based on a continuous relationship between slenderness and (inelastic) local buckling and a rational exploitation of strain hardening. The development and application of the continuous strength method to structural steel design is described herein. Materials that exhibit a high degree of nonlinearity and strain hardening, such as aluminium, stainless steel and some high-strength steels, fit less appropriately into the framework of cross-section classification, and generally benefit to a greater extent from the continuous strength method. The method provides better agreement with test results in comparison to existing design codes, and offers increases in member resistance and a reduction in scatter of the prediction. An additional benefit of the proposed approach is that cross-section deformation capacity is explicitly determined in the calculations, thus enabling a more sophisticated and informed assessment of ductility supply and demand. Further developments to the method are under way.
Article navigation
June 2008
Research Article|
June 01 2008
The continuous strength method
L. Gardner, MSc, PhD, DIC, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
L. Gardner, MSc, PhD, DIC, CEng, MICE, MIStructE
Senior Lecturer in Structural Engineering
Imperial College London
UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
September 20 2007
Accepted:
March 07 2008
Online ISSN: 1751-7702
Print ISSN: 0965-0911
© 2008 Thomas Telford Ltd
2008
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings (2008) 161 (3): 127–133.
Article history
Received:
September 20 2007
Accepted:
March 07 2008
Citation
Gardner L (2008), "The continuous strength method". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, Vol. 161 No. 3 pp. 127–133, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2008.161.3.127
Download citation file:
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
