Single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) models are frequently used in the seismic analysis of bridges, in particular in recent years when inelastic, SDOF-based push-over analysis has become increasingly popular. However, the scope of applicability of these models has not yet been clearly defined (e.g., in the Eurocode 8/2). Using SDOF models, displacements and forces could be significantly underestimated, especially in ‘irregular structures’. The authors have therefore proposed a more adequate criterion for the applicability of SDOF models, and a clearer definition of regularity. The seismic response of some typical European viaducts has been studied. Several different seismic analysis methods, both elastic and inelastic, were used, incorporating different levels of structural model simplification. Differences in the response obtained by using SDOF and multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) models were analysed. If these differences were significant, the response was considered to be irregular and the SDOF model unsuitable. For the quantitative estimation of the regularity and applicability of SDOF models a ‘regularity index’ has been introduced. The index is based on a comparison between the different displacement shapes obtained within two iterations of the single mode static analysis. Using this index the main parameters influencing the irregular response of the viaducts were identified and analysed.
Article navigation
May 2003
Research Article|
May 01 2003
Bridges: when is single mode seismic analysis adequate? Available to Purchase
T. Isaković;
T. Isaković
Assistant Professor
Institute of Structural Engineering, Earthquake Engineering and Construction IT, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana
Slovenia
Search for other works by this author on:
M. Fischinger;
M. Fischinger
Professor
Institute of Structural Engineering, Earthquake Engineering and Construction IT, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana
Slovenia
Search for other works by this author on:
P. Kante
P. Kante
Researcher
Institute of Structural Engineering, Earthquake Engineering and Construction IT, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana
Slovenia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
September 26 2000
Accepted:
July 15 2002
Online ISSN: 1751-7702
Print ISSN: 0965-0911
© 2003 Thomas Telford Ltd
2003
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings (2003) 156 (2): 165–173.
Article history
Received:
September 26 2000
Accepted:
July 15 2002
Citation
Isaković T, Fischinger M, Kante P (2003), "Bridges: when is single mode seismic analysis adequate?". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings, Vol. 156 No. 2 pp. 165–173, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/stbu.2003.156.2.165
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
A case study on the P–Δ effect on inelastic seismic behaviour of a bridge pier
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (June,2013)
Simulation of self-centring fibre-reinforced concrete columns
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational Mechanics (June,2008)
The response of Karnali Bridge, Nepal to near-fault earthquakes
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (December,2012)
Performance-based seismic design of a continuous bridge
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (December,2008)
The use of modal-combination rules with cable-stayed bridges
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering (December,2010)
Related Chapters
Tension cables in suspension bridges. A case of form-finding
Tension Structures: Form and behaviour
Introduction
Bridge Construction Equipment
Lord Hill’s Bridge Mitigation Works
Crossrail Project: Infrastructure Design and Construction
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
