Shared space is an approach to street design which minimises demarcations between vehicles and pedestrians. It has become particularly influential in the UK, where a comprehensive study of shared space schemes has informed recently published national guidance to local highway authorities. This paper critically examines the claim made in the guidance that it is ‘evidence based'. Primary research reported in the paper examines one of the sites in the ‘official study' in Ashford, Kent, in greater depth, using video observation and a street survey of pedestrians. The findings show that most pedestrians diverted away from their desire lines, gave way to vehicles in most cases and felt safer under the original road layout. This evidence, and the analysis of the ‘official study', cast doubt on some aspects of the methodology and its interpretation in the national guidance. The authors conclude that some of the claims made on behalf of shared space have overstated the available evidence, and that caution is needed in implementing shared space schemes, particularly in environments of high traffic flows.
Article navigation
November 2014
Research Article|
November 01 2014
Shared space – research, policy and problems Available to Purchase
Simon Moody, MSc;
Simon Moody, MSc
Transport Planner
WSP UK Ltd, Cambridge, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Steve Melia, PhD
Steve Melia, PhD
Senior Lecturer
Centre for Transport & Society, University of the West of England, Bristol, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Revision Received:
April 24 2012
Accepted:
November 23 2012
Online ISSN: 1751-7710
Print ISSN: 0965-092X
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2014
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (2014) 167 (6): 384–392.
Article history
Revision Received:
April 24 2012
Accepted:
November 23 2012
Citation
Moody S, Melia S (2014), "Shared space – research, policy and problems". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, Vol. 167 No. 6 pp. 384–392, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.12.00047
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
The basis for Dublin's transportation policy beyond 2000
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (August,2000)
The observational method can be simple
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (April,2001)
Greenwich peninsula—transport planning for the third millennium
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2000)
Setting out the Channel Tunnel Rail Link
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2001)
Information: the key to more intelligent use of transport infrastructure
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Civil Engineering (May,2005)
Related Chapters
The Integration of the Connection Between Land Use and Traffic Surrounding Rail Transit Stations: The Case of Nanjing
Sustainable Transport for Chinese Cities
Planning for Disruptive Transport Technologies: How Prepared Are Australian Transport Agencies?
Governance of the Smart Mobility Transition
Qualitative Methods in Transport Research: The ‘Action Research’ Approach
Transport Survey Methods: Best Practice for Decision Making
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
