Increasing urbanisation around the world has raised the passenger demand for public transport. Many public transport technologies are available to meet this demand. This paper develops a spreadsheet cost model that simulates public transport modes operated on a 12-km route and incorporates a new public transport mode, the straddle bus. Previous research has assumed that demand is exogenous (externally fixed). This work investigates the impact of endogenous demand, which varies with service level characteristics. Elasticities for passenger waiting time and in-vehicle time are used to assess actual passenger reactions to the attractiveness for different public transport technologies at different levels of demand. The result of this work shows the lowest average social and operator cost public transport technologies for different ranges of demand. Based on the default values used in the spreadsheet model, smaller size vehicles (e.g. personal rapid transit and minibus) dominate the low passenger demand range due to their short waiting times. Single-decker and double-decker buses appear to be the best option for a demand of around 3000–60 000 passengers per day (ppd), followed by the straddle bus (from around 60 000 to 100 000 ppd). The great capacity but high capital costs of underground make it the most cost-effective technology when other technologies are experiencing high congestion, with demand levels higher than 100 000 ppd.
Article navigation
August 2015
Research Article|
August 01 2015
Reassessing the financial and social costs of public transport Available to Purchase
Xucheng Li, BEng;
Xucheng Li, BEng
PhD Student
Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
John Preston, BA, MA, PhD, MCILT, FRGS, FCIHT,
John Preston, BA, MA, PhD, MCILT, FRGS, FCIHT,
Head of Civil
Maritime and Environmental Engineering and Science, Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Revision Received:
December 10 2012
Accepted:
October 01 2014
Online ISSN: 1751-7710
Print ISSN: 0965-092X
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2015
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (2015) 168 (4): 356–369.
Article history
Revision Received:
December 10 2012
Accepted:
October 01 2014
Citation
Li X, Preston J (2015), "Reassessing the financial and social costs of public transport". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, Vol. 168 No. 4 pp. 356–369, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/tran.12.00096
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Increasing car dependency of children: should we be worried?
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer (March,2002)
Multi-level strategy for segregation reduction; the case of Ray-Tehran
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (November,2017)
Transport poverty and its adverse social consequences
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (March,2016)
HS2 railway, UK: route optioneering
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (March,2019)
Vision 2030: transport visions for strategic highways
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (November,2004)
Related Chapters
The Integration of the Connection Between Land Use and Traffic Surrounding Rail Transit Stations: The Case of Nanjing
Sustainable Transport for Chinese Cities
Impact Investment Firms and Institutionalization in Emerging Countries
The Changing Global Power Balance: Challenges for European Firms
Shaping the Future of Work: A Review of Research on HR Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation and Social Impact
Climate Change and Social Responsibility
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
