In scheduled air transport, airline profitability is strongly impacted by an airline's ability to construct flight schedules. Airlines face operational challenges such as schedule disruptions and limited resources affecting the efficiency of the operations. These delays may have cascading impacts on the subsequent flights, as they affect the crew's schedule and possibly aircraft schedules as well. Consequently, negative effects of the initial delay propagate through the network until the slack between flights can absorb the delay. This paper makes functional and economic comparisons between robust planning and disruption management in the case of delay. Approaches based on the Dantzig–Wolfe decomposition are used to solve the problem. The proposed technique was implemented on an actual data set of one of the major Iranian airlines with more than 35 aeroplanes that fly between 50 airports. The computational results show the proposed methodology can solve the problem optimally and significantly reduce the delay of flights.
Article navigation
October 2018
Research Article|
July 11 2017
A model for incorporating robustness into flight planning Available to Purchase
Hassan Khaksar, Msc
;
Hassan Khaksar, Msc
PhD student in Transportation Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran (corresponding author: hasankhaksar@yahoo.com)
Search for other works by this author on:
Abdolreza Sheikholeslami, PhD
Abdolreza Sheikholeslami, PhD
Assistant Professor
Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
November 26 2015
Accepted:
May 30 2017
Online ISSN: 1751-7710
Print ISSN: 0965-092X
ICE Publishing: All rights reserved
2017
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (2018) 171 (5): 275–285.
Article history
Received:
November 26 2015
Accepted:
May 30 2017
Citation
Khaksar H, Sheikholeslami A (2018), "A model for incorporating robustness into flight planning". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, Vol. 171 No. 5 pp. 275–285, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/jtran.15.00119
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
The satisfaction of human needs in airport passenger terminals
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (February,2001)
Modelling surface access mode choice of air passengers
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (May,2009)
A worldwide, machine-generated airfield database: better than hand-curated datasets?
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (July,2020)
A method to evaluate determinant factors on airport check-in level of service
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (September,2018)
Development of Aruba airport: a privatisation cost model
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport (February,2001)
Related Chapters
Introduction
Inside London's Airports Policy: Indecision, decision and counter-decision
A brief overview of air-transport history
Inside London's Airports Policy: Indecision, decision and counter-decision
Airports policy up to the 1974 Maplin Review
Inside London's Airports Policy: Indecision, decision and counter-decision
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
