High-quality urban realm generates benefits to pedestrians in terms of improved walking experience and contributes to the socio-economic vitality of streets and neighbourhoods. However, it is very difficult to value and quantify those benefits. Historically, transport appraisal guidance has only allowed for the quantification of safety and time-saving benefits to pedestrians, which represent a small portion of benefits arising from public realm schemes. There are two main approaches to valuing the benefits to be gained from improved urban realm: the bottom-up approach of valuing benefits to individuals through stated preference (SP) and a top-to-bottom approach using revealed preference (RP). A method for quantifying user benefits using SP surveys has been developed. SP, however, only represents a partial valuation of benefits (not accounting for wider socio-economic benefits) and the values derived from SP surveys are subject to uncertainty. An alternative approach, using RP, measured the impact of public realm quality on market prices (retail rents and residential property prices). Although the results from this work showed a link between the quality of public realm and market prices, more research is needed to assess and value the benefits of public realm schemes.
Article navigation
March 2009
Research Article|
March 01 2009
Making a case for investment in the public realm Available to Purchase
P. Buchanan, MIHT;
P. Buchanan, MIHT
Head of Economics
Colin Buchanan
London, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
N. Gay, MSc
N. Gay, MSc
Senior Economist
Colin Buchanan
London, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
February 07 2008
Accepted:
September 04 2008
Online ISSN: 1755-0807
Print ISSN: 1755-0793
© 2009 Thomas Telford Ltd
2009
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (2009) 162 (1): 29–34.
Article history
Received:
February 07 2008
Accepted:
September 04 2008
Citation
Buchanan P, Gay N (2009), "Making a case for investment in the public realm". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning, Vol. 162 No. 1 pp. 29–34, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/udap.2009.162.1.29
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Public value capture capacity in the urban renewal project process: Fikirtepe case
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Municipal Engineer (October,2021)
Governance of temporary use
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (August,2019)
Regions in transition: a lesson for built environment stakeholders
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (January,2016)
Psychological factors to motivate sustainable behaviours
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (March,2014)
City centre in the era of consumer culture
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Urban Design and Planning (December,2015)
Related Chapters
Rethinking urban regeneration? Insights into the future through use of the Strategic-relational approach
Looking for Consensus?: Civil Society, Social Movements and Crises for Public Management
European Tourism Policy
Knowledge Management in Tourism: Policy and Governance Applications
Collaborative Strategy for Tourism Development and Regeneration: Italy’s Coast of Naples
Knowledge Transfer to and within Tourism: Academic, Industry and Government Bridges
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
