Meeting UK targets for waste reduction will require careful planning and informed investment in infrastructure. An essential prerequisite for both is the availability of robust waste data. This paper compares four methods for estimating food waste in Hampshire, two for business waste and two for household waste. First, household food waste is estimated from food expenditure data using an expenditure data approach. This is compared against household waste collection data. Next, business waste is estimated by applying data published by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) to the business profile of the hospitality sector in Hampshire. These results are compared with those from the application of a different survey approach to the same business profile. The research illustrates significant problems in achieving consistent and reliable data, especially for business. It was found that some published data are very likely to underestimate food waste in the hospitality sector due to the amount of waste classified in miscellaneous categories such as mixed or general waste. The findings could apply to other sectors. The paper discusses the implications of these findings, highlighting in particular an urgent need for the release and publication of current commercial and industrial waste data, as well as more robust sector-specific surveys and consistent accounting frameworks.
Article navigation
February 2009
Research Article|
February 01 2009
Accounting for food waste: comparative analysis within the UK
P. Bradley, MSc;
P. Bradley, MSc
Postgraduate Research Student
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey
Guildford, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
C. Thomas, MSc;
C. Thomas, MSc
Research Fellow
Integrated Waste Systems Research Group, The Open University
Milton Keynes, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
A. Druckman, MSc;
A. Druckman, MSc
Research Fellow
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey
Guildford, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
T. Jackson, MSc
T. Jackson, MSc
Professor of Sustainable Development
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey
Guildford, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Received:
May 27 2008
Accepted:
September 08 2008
Online ISSN: 1747-6534
Print ISSN: 1747-6526
© 2009 Thomas Telford Ltd
2009
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management (2009) 162 (1): 5–13.
Article history
Received:
May 27 2008
Accepted:
September 08 2008
Citation
Bradley P, Thomas C, Druckman A, Jackson T (2009), "Accounting for food waste: comparative analysis within the UK". Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, Vol. 162 No. 1 pp. 5–13, doi: https://doi.org/10.1680/warm.2009.162.1.5
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Structural performance of a steep slope landfill lining system
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Geotechnical Engineering (July,2004)
Design and specification of tyre bales in construction
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management (May,2008)
Carbon in waste: strategies for treatment and landfilling
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management (November,2009)
Briefing: Urban-mining of landfills
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management (November,2013)
Modelling the landfill process using GasSim2
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management (August,2008)
Related Chapters
Engineered waste disposal by landfill
Environmental Geotechnics in Practice: Introduction and case studies
Waste disposal by landfill
Environmental Geotechnics, 2nd edition
Adapting to Climate Change on the Lincolnshire Coastline through the Lincshore Beach Management Scheme
From Sea to Shore – Meeting the Challenges of the Sea: (Coasts, Marine Structures and Breakwaters 2013)
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
