The meaning of cybernetics of sociocultural systems is discussed in terms of two rival traditions. Both are reductionistic with respect to cognitive interaction: One seeks a reduction to (A) the Artificial Gestalt of symbolic representations; the other to (B) the Biological Gestalt of cellular reproduction. Cultural Gestalt‐switches and other irreducible properties, such as intersubjectivity and capacity for consciousness, call for a third position in terms of (D) Dialogue and Dualities, which comprises and transcends the complementarity of (A) and (B). Conditions are indicated for shifts between modes conforming to both, and for the prevalence and resolution of model monopoly. Examples are given from small group studies and socioeconomic planning in Norway.
Article navigation
1 March 1984
Review Article|
March 01 1984
THE THIRD POSITION—BEYOND ARTIFICIAL AND AUTOPOIETIC REDUCTION Available to Purchase
STEIN BRÅTEN
STEIN BRÅTEN
Sociology Department, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1096, Blindern, Oslo 3 (Norway)
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7883
Print ISSN: 0368-492X
© MCB UP Limited
1984
Kybernetes (1984) 13 (3): 157–163.
Citation
BRÅTEN S (1984), "THE THIRD POSITION—BEYOND ARTIFICIAL AND AUTOPOIETIC REDUCTION". Kybernetes, Vol. 13 No. 3 pp. 157–163, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb005686
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Supply chain as an autopoietic learning system
Supply Chain Management: An International Journal (January,2014)
Expert evaluation study of an autopoietic model of knowledge
Journal of Knowledge Management (July,2011)
Organisational memories in project‐based companies: an autopoietic view
The Learning Organization: An International Journal (March,2010)
Business organizations' knowledge‐production processes: an autopoietic approach
International Journal of Organizational Analysis (May,2013)
Observation's role in technically complex project implementation: the social autopoietic system view
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business (March,2013)
Related Chapters
Chapter 15 Autonomous Cooperation — A Way to Implement Autopoietic Characteristics into Complex Adaptive Logistic Systems?
Advanced Series in Management
Chapter 8 Plugging the Theoretical Gaps: How Autopoietic Theory Can Contribute to Process-Based Organizational Research
Advanced Series in Management
Chapter 12 The Autopoiesis of Organizational Knowledge, Learning, and Memory
Advanced Series in Management
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
