The transition is described from the “mediated society” (Lachs) to the “network society” (Castells), caused by the increasingly rapid complexification of modern society. On the level of psychic systems, i.e. the individual’s consciousness, the modern network society promotes new (non‐Marxist and non‐psychiatric) forms of powerlessness and meaningless. On the level of social systems, i.e. the system of communications in the network society, the results of this are described. The network society is only partially developed: in some areas more than others, in the economic and political more than in the cultural sphere. As an example, the present‐day situation in Yugoslavia is discussed, as well as the chances for the emergence of world‐wide minimum norms, both ecological and anti‐genocide.
Article navigation
1 December 2001
Research Article|
December 01 2001
Pockets of irrationality in an increasingly rational world: An effort to simplify unmanageable environmental over‐complexity? Available to Purchase
Felix Geyer
Felix Geyer
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7883
Print ISSN: 0368-492X
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Kybernetes (2001) 30 (9-10): 1155–1178.
Citation
Geyer F (2001), "Pockets of irrationality in an increasingly rational world: An effort to simplify unmanageable environmental over‐complexity?". Kybernetes, Vol. 30 No. 9-10 pp. 1155–1178, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03684920110405728
Download citation file:
192
Views
Suggested Reading
Cybernetics and Social Science: Theories and Research in Sociocybernetics
Kybernetes (June,1991)
Man in a garrulous silence
Kybernetes (October,1996)
The specification of the human brain
Kybernetes (June,1996)
Information, communications and entertainment 21st century (ICE 21)-an Intelligent Home Centre
Kybernetes (April,2003)
On the analysis and modelling of computer communication systems
Kybernetes (July,2002)
Related Chapters
Why the Biomedical Research Ethics Model Is Inappropriate for Social Sciences: A Response to ‘Responsible to Whom? Obligations to Participants and Society in Social Science Research’ by Matt Sleat
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
About ‘Othering’ Ourselves in a System with Discrepant Values: The Research Ethics Review Process Today
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Towards Common Principles for Social Science Research Ethics: A Discussion Document for the Academy of Social Sciences
Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics Across the Social Sciences
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
