The aim is to review developments on the internet, especially those of general cybernetic interest.
A recent episode involving a hoax paper is reviewed, along with discussions of the implications for paper refereeing and information dissemination generally. Some sources of information on nanotechnology, with applications in medicine, are reviewed.
That a hoax paper was accepted casts doubt on the review process, but the situation is not clear‐cut and the usefulness of mammoth conferences is also questioned. Nanotechnology is shown to be poised for major advances.
The generation of a convincing hoax paper is an interesting technical achievement in itself. Implications for the review process are explored. Sources of information on nanotechnology are indicated.
It is hoped this is a valuable periodic review.
