Library consortia require automation systems that adequately address the following questions: Can the system support centralized and decentralized server configurations? Does the software’s architecture accommodate changing requirements? Does the system provide seamless behavior? Contends that the evolution of distributed enterprise computing technology has brought the library automation industry to a new realization that automation systems engineered with an n‐tiered client/server architecture will best meet the needs of library consortia. Standards‐based distributed processing is the key to the n‐tier client/server paradigm. While some technologies (i.e. UNIX) provide for a single standard on which to define distributed processing, only Microsoft’s Windows NT supports multiple standards. From Microsoft’s perspective, the Windows NT operating system is the middle tier of the n‐tier client/server environment. To truly exploit the middle tier, an application must utilize Microsoft Transaction Server (MTS). Native Windows NT automation systems utilizing MTS are best positioned for the future because MTS assumes an n‐tier architecture with the middle tier (or tiers) deployed on Windows NT Server. “Native” NT applications are built in and for Microsoft Windows NT. Library consortia considering a native Windows NT automation system should evaluate the system’s distributed processing capabilities to determine its applicability to their needs. Library consortia can test a vendor’s claim to scalable distributed processing by asking three questions: Is the software dependent on the type of data being used? Does the software support logical and physical separation (distribution)? Does the software require a systems‐shut down to perform database or application updates?
Article navigation
1 December 1999
Review Article|
December 01 1999
Distributed processing and Windows NT: The ideal infrastructure for library consortia
Michael J. Frasciello;
Michael J. Frasciello
Senior Technical Writer, MPC, Gaylord Information Systems, New York, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
John Richardson
John Richardson
Business Development Manager, Gaylord Information Systems, New York, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1466-2760
Print ISSN: 1466-2752
© MCB UP Limited
1999
Library Consortium Management: An International Journal (1999) 1 (3-4): 76–83.
Citation
Frasciello MJ, Richardson J (1999), "Distributed processing and Windows NT: The ideal infrastructure for library consortia". Library Consortium Management: An International Journal, Vol. 1 No. 3-4 pp. 76–83, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14662769910305768
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
High-Performance Client/Server: A Guide to Building and Managing Robust Distributed Systems
Internet Research (December,1998)
Getting beyond the dark side of distributed computing
Information Management & Computer Security (May,1996)
Capital City Libraries: a model of community cooperation
The Bottom Line (March,1995)
Client/server infrastructure: a case study in planning and conversion
Industrial Management & Data Systems (September,1997)
NORDINFO (Nordic Council for Scientific Information): financing international development without bureaucracy
The Bottom Line (September,2000)
Related Chapters
Boosting Public–Private Partnership in Infrastructure: PPP Expansion in Colombia
The Emerald Handbook of Public–Private Partnerships in Developing and Emerging Economies: Perspectives on Public Policy, Entrepreneurship and Poverty
Universally Accessible Makerspace Recommendation to the District of Columbia Public Library
Accessibility for Persons with Disabilities and the Inclusive Future of Libraries
The Degree of Private Participation in PPPs: Evidence from Developing and Emerging Economies
The Emerald Handbook of Public–Private Partnerships in Developing and Emerging Economies: Perspectives on Public Policy, Entrepreneurship and Poverty
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
