Article navigation
Purpose

This paper mainly aims to explore the AI Open research Plagiarism Dupli Checker, Scribbr Plagiarism Checker, Quetext and Small SEO Tools Plagiarism Checker and provides a comparative study about the features and benefits.

Design/methodology/approach

This study provides a check list for AI Open research Plagiarism Dupli Checker, Scribbr Plagiarism Checker, Quetext and Small SEO Tools Plagiarism Checker according to the features and limitations.

Findings

After the analysis, it is found that DupliChecker scans up to 1,000 words per check; Scribbr, authorized partner of Turnitin, scans up to paid bases; Quetext offers free 500-word plagiarism and Small SEO Tools scans up to 1,000 words per check. The limitations noted are as follows: Dupli Checker provides limited checks per month, Quetext offers limited free scan and Small SEO Tools have limited features compared to other options.

Research limitations/implications

This study shows the comparative study of AI Plagiarism online tools and is very useful for researchers and learners. The value of this study is to improve the user’s experience and performance of AI plagiarism.

Originality/value

This study shows the comparative study of AI Plagiarism online tools and is very useful for researchers and learners. This study finds out the user experience and awareness accessibility about the performance of open AI plagiarism feature and function.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal