Audit committees have become more important and prevalent in recent years but there is a relative paucity of empirical research concerning their value. This paper contributes to this research by reporting an analysis of the relationship between the size of the audit fee and the existence of an audit committee. The analysis builds on previous research in this area in several ways. First, it uses more recent data than previous research which may have been influenced by transitional problems. The data in this paper were collected from financial reports for the years ending in 1994 and 1995. Second, it investigates the effect on audit fees of audit committee adherence to the Cadbury Committee Report recommendations of 1992. Finally, the analysis is set within a theoretical framework developed from agency theory. The results suggest that audit committees have been through a transitional phase comprising changes to the general audit environment and a learning phase for the establishment and operation of committees. By 1995 there is no evidence that audit committees, whether adhering to the Cadbury Code or not, have any overall effect on audit fees. The only effect found was a reduction in fees due to improved internal controls in the presence of auditee complexity. There was evidence that size was the main determinant of the presence of an audit committee.
Article navigation
1 October 2000
Research Article|
October 01 2000
Audit committees, Cadbury Code and audit fees: an empirical analysis of UK companies
Andrew R. Goddard;
Andrew R. Goddard
University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Carol Masters
Carol Masters
Southampton Institute, Southampton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7735
Print ISSN: 0268-6902
© MCB UP Limited
2000
Managerial Auditing Journal (2000) 15 (7): 358–371.
Citation
Goddard AR, Masters C (2000), "Audit committees, Cadbury Code and audit fees: an empirical analysis of UK companies". Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 15 No. 7 pp. 358–371, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900010344638
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Sarbanes‐Oxley and audit failure: A critical examination
Managerial Auditing Journal (April,2004)
Corporate governance structures, managerial attributes and the accuracy of expected pension contributions
Journal of Applied Accounting Research (March,2025)
Improving corporate governance: the role of audit committee disclosures
Managerial Auditing Journal (August,2003)
The role of audit committees in managing relationships with external auditors after SOX: Evidence from the USA
Managerial Auditing Journal (April,2009)
Characteristics of audit committee financial experts: an empirical study
Managerial Auditing Journal (November,2012)
Related Chapters
Corporate Governance and Audit Report Timeliness: Evidence from Malaysia
Accounting in Asia
A Crisis of Investor Confidence: Corporate Governance and the Imbalance of Power
Advances in Financial Economics
An Empirical Investigation of Student Career Interests in Auditing Using the Big Five Model of Personality
Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
