One of the ways to deal with stakeholder issues, is the use and application of accountability standards. Two recent accountability standards (AA1000 and SA8000) will be the subject of comparison in this paper. Firstly, the constituent elements of these new standards will be briefly described. The main purpose of this paper is a systematic comparison of both standards on their object and scope, their normative perspective, the basic principles, their improvement perspective and their methodological perspective. The paper concludes by discussing the added value of both standards in their use and practical application. Questions are raised as to whether the instrumental “translation” of notions such as “accountability” and “social responsibility” offer the right support to deal with these issues on an organizational level.
Article navigation
1 February 2003
Conceptual Paper|
February 01 2003
AA1000 and SA8000 compared: a systematic comparison of contemporary accountability standards
Math Göbbels;
Math Göbbels
Institute for Quality, Sustainability and Innovation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Jan Jonker
Jan Jonker
Nijmegen Business School, University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7735
Print ISSN: 0268-6902
© MCB UP Limited
2003
Managerial Auditing Journal (2003) 18 (1): 54–58.
Citation
Göbbels M, Jonker J (2003), "AA1000 and SA8000 compared: a systematic comparison of contemporary accountability standards". Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 18 No. 1 pp. 54–58, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900310454246
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Audit independence in the UK – the state of the art
Managerial Auditing Journal (November,1999)
Corporate social responsibility – a PR invention?
Corporate Communications: An International Journal (March,2001)
The big issues – part 1
Industrial and Commercial Training (June,2001)
Outsourcing implications for accounting practices
Managerial Auditing Journal (November,1999)
Attitudes towards offensive advertising: an Australian study
Journal of Consumer Marketing (June,1999)
Related Chapters
Chapter 20 Teachers Dealing with Failure in a Low Socio-Economic Status School in South Africa
From Teacher Thinking to Teachers and Teaching: The Evolution of a Research Community
Local government in England: Fault lines in ethical governance?
Looking for Consensus?: Civil Society, Social Movements and Crises for Public Management
How Framed Information and Justification Impact Capital Budgeting Decisions
Advances in Management Accounting
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
