The mathematical modelling of audit fees has emerged in research as one means by which the factors which explain the level and variability of audit fees can be examined. Existing literature shows that auditee size and complexity are major determinants of audit costs incurred by an auditee. Examines the power of these and other variables in explaining the variability of external audit fees for a sample of Australia′s largest listed companies and contributes to the existing literature by examining other potentially important factors which explain audit fees,some of which are unique to the present study. Reports results for the effect of: the presence of particular audit firms (for example, Coopers& Lybrand as opposed to say, Price Waterhouse); the extent of the level of internal audit in the auditee and; industrial classification of the auditee (for example, mining, manufacturing, retail, etc.). Results show that a very high proportion of reported audit fees can be explained by linear regression models, especially for certain auditors (for example,Peat Marwick, where over 93 per cent of the variability in fees can be explained by the model) and for certain industries (for example, the building industry, where over 90 per cent of variability is explained). Notes several limitations, especially those relating to measurement difficulties.
Article navigation
1 November 1994
Conceptual Paper|
November 01 1994
Audit Fees: The Effects of Auditee, Auditor and Industry Differences
Iain Gerrard;
Iain Gerrard
Auditor with Arthur Andersen and Co., Perth, Western Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Keith Houghton;
Keith Houghton
Fitzgerald Professor of Accounting, Department of Accounting and Finance, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria,Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
David Woodliff
David Woodliff
Lecturer with the Department of Accounting and Finance,University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7735
Print ISSN: 0268-6902
© MCB UP Limited
1994
Managerial Auditing Journal (1994) 9 (7): 3–11.
Citation
Gerrard I, Houghton K, Woodliff D (1994), "Audit Fees: The Effects of Auditee, Auditor and Industry Differences". Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 9 No. 7 pp. 3–11, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/02686909410067534
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
The External Auditor′s Consideration of the Internal Audit Function
Managerial Auditing Journal (November,1994)
Viewpoint: internal auditing in Slovenia
Managerial Auditing Journal (October,1996)
The objectivity of accounting professionals based in India
Managerial Auditing Journal (May,2023)
An Empirical Comparison of Internal and External Audit Supervision
Managerial Auditing Journal (February,1993)
Time Budget Pressure and Filtering of Time Practices in Internal Auditing: A Survey
Managerial Auditing Journal (September,1994)
Related Chapters
The Relationship Between the Audit Triangle (Internal and External Audit, and Audit Committee): With Reference to the Internal Control System and Fraud Prevention
Innovative Horizons: Insights for Technology, Sustainability and Education in the Digital Era
Understanding Internal Audit, External Audit, and Audit Fees
Innovative Horizons: Insights for Technology, Sustainability and Education in the Digital Era
Public Sector External Auditing in Tanzania: A Theory of Managing Colonising Tendencies
The Public Sector Accounting, Accountability and Auditing in Emerging Economies
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
