Article navigation
Purpose

Companies in the financial services sector are faced with a turbulent, destabilizing environment and challenged to maintain existing activities while seizing new opportunities to remain competitive. In this vein, technological innovation project teams play a key role, and therefore understanding how these teams work and how their members interact throughout the life cycle of a technological innovation project is important.

Design/methodology/approach

This research, carried out in a large financial institution, analyzes five technological innovation projects and their teams over an entire year to better understand the evolution from the exploration phase to the exploitation phase during the life cycle of such projects. To do so, the authors conducted a qualitative case study, in which they took both observer and participant roles. They analyzed the data using NVivo software and created a data structure in accordance with the Gioia method.

Findings

The findings show an overlap phase between exploration and exploitation, with work on the product preceding work on the business model. This finding implies an adaptation of models presuming a sequential transition from exploration to exploitation and leads to managerial implications on how to manage the simultaneity of both logics during the identified overlap.

Research limitations/implications

Research focuses on one traditional company, limiting generalizability to newer, smaller firms.

Practical implications

Research shows that companies with contextual ambidexterity manage innovation better than those with structural ambidexterity by allowing flexible integration of exploration and exploitation tasks, promoting smoother transitions in innovation phases.

Social implications

Research enhancing understanding of innovation processes is crucial for better management and could improve company culture and work–life balance for project teams.

Originality/value

This research follows teams during the life cycle of five technological innovation projects and reveals a key moment that has been relatively understudied: the transition between the exploration phase and the exploitation phase.

Highlights
  • This article examines teams involved in technological innovation projects.

  • The main theoretical frameworks are organizational ambidexterity and team processes.

  • The research involves a study of five projects in a large European financial institution.

  • The findings reveal an overlapping phase between exploration and exploitation.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options