New developments in the manufacturing industries require reexamining both the performance evaluation techniques and the concept of performance itself. As to evaluation, the return on investment model (ROI), popular during the 1950s throughout the 1970s, has faced much criticism that in the 1980s and the 1990s new financial and nonfinancial performance evaluation methods gained popularity. On a world‐wide basis, the increasing adoption of automation and the trend toward more centralization have changed the concept of performance. No longer based on motivating and directing the labor force, performance now aims to obtain the best results out of robotic assets and flexible manufacturing systems (FMS), which require new managerial attention and attitude. These factors have made the concept of performance more vague and difficult to define and measure. After comparing and contrasting how multinational and domestic companies evalu‐ate corporate performance, the study reconstructs the concept of performance, bringing forth fundamental propositions (axioms) of the long‐run dimension of measurement and utilization as the core of performance. Developing utilization as a dynamic concept with constantly changing components, a long‐term discounted‐cash‐flow return on investment (DCF‐ROI) model is developed and exhibited as a comprehensive measure of utilization. The DCF‐ROI model fits harmoniously into the mechanisms of the new cost reduction techniques of target and kaizen costing. Kaizen, a Japanese term, is translated into English as “improvement,” i.e., a continuous accumulation of betterment activities over the long run. Target and Kaizen costing are conditioned by top management's target profit which can take the form of a DCF‐ROI objective. This kaizen‐oriented DCF‐ROI is demonstrated as a moving average ratio that captures the dynamic utilization through its progression over ten years. Limitations of the model and recommendations for further research are also presented.
Article navigation
1 September 1995
Review Article|
September 01 1995
Measuring Long‐term Performance for Advanced Manufacturing Technology: An International Perspective
Mohamed E. Bayou;
Mohamed E. Bayou
School of Management, University of Michigan‐Dearborn, Dearborn, MI 48128–1491
Search for other works by this author on:
Alan Reinstein
Alan Reinstein
Department of Accounting, School of Business, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7743
Print ISSN: 0307-4358
© MCB UP Limited
1995
Managerial Finance (1995) 21 (9): 3–24.
Citation
Bayou ME, Reinstein A (1995), "Measuring Long‐term Performance for Advanced Manufacturing Technology: An International Perspective". Managerial Finance, Vol. 21 No. 9 pp. 3–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb018530
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Kaizen within Kaizen Teams: Continuous and Process Improvements in a Spanish municipality
Asian Journal on Quality (April,2008)
Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study
International Journal of Operations & Production Management (December,2003)
Kaizen in Japan: transferring knowledge in the workplace
Journal of Business Strategy (May,2018)
Three-dimensional sustainability of Kaizen
The TQM Journal (April,2018)
Kaizen: working responsively with psychopathic traits
Journal of Criminological Research, Policy and Practice (June,2018)
Related Chapters
The Effect of Applying Kaizen Costing Approach on Profitability
Innovative Horizons: Insights for Technology, Sustainability and Education in the Digital Era
KAIZEN in the Development of People's Purpose (K'AAT–KAIZEN)
KAIZEN-21: The Philosophy of Continuous Improvement and Operational Innovation in the New Global Environment
Kaizen for Higher Education
Operational Excellence Case Studies in Higher Education Institutions
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
