In many countries, governmental organizations decentralized their organization structures, leading to an increased relevance of performance information. This paper identifies two approaches to measure performance in the not‐for‐profit sector: an output‐focused and a throughput‐focused approach. Furthermore, the paper sets a contingency framework concerning the applicability of these two approaches. The two most important contingent variables, i.e., whether output can be identified and whether activities are repetitive, determine the possibilities to apply the two approaches. If it is possible to apply both approaches, the ambiguity of organizational objectives, the hierarchical position of information users and the relevance of efficiency and quality are additional contingent variables that influence the approach to assess performance. Finally, the paper identifies how the approach to measure performance relates to management control types. If none of the two approaches is applicable, the organization has to rely on a management control type without an explicit system to measure performance, i.e., political or judgmental control. Routine or trial‐and‐error control fit with both approaches to measure performance. Expert and intuitive control are control types that rely on output‐based approaches to measure performance.
Article navigation
1 August 2004
Review Article|
August 01 2004
Performance measurement in governmental organizations: a contingent approach to measurement and management control Available to Purchase
E. Pieter Jansen
E. Pieter Jansen
Faculty of Management and Organization, University of Groningen, P.O. Box 800, 9700 AV Groningen, The Netherlands
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 1758-7743
Print ISSN: 0307-4358
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2004
Managerial Finance (2004) 30 (8): 54–68.
Citation
Pieter Jansen E (2004), "Performance measurement in governmental organizations: a contingent approach to measurement and management control". Managerial Finance, Vol. 30 No. 8 pp. 54–68, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350410769227
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Management musings 7: no‐one will tell bosses what they are like
Library Management (June,2002)
Learning Styles: Salary and Promotion Decisions among Auditing Professionals
Managerial Auditing Journal (February,1987)
Family Business Management Activities, Styles and Characteristics: A Correlational Study
Mid-American Journal of Business (April,2004)
Confucianism and the Art of Chinese Management
Journal of Asia Business Studies (July,2006)
Perceptions of religious Israeli high school principals regarding school climate after the COVID-19 pandemic, and its connection to their management style
International Journal of Educational Management (March,2024)
Related Chapters
Performance measures for highway structures
Bridge Management 5: Inspection, maintenance, assessment and repair: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Bridge Management, organized by the University of Surrey, 11–13 April 2005
How are they doing? The Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to Develop a Strategic Performance Appraisal on Individual Level
A Focused Issue on Building New Competences in Dynamic Environments
What Matters with PMS? Critical Check Points in the Success of PMS
Performance Measurement and Management Control: Contemporary Issues
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
