Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

Many questionnaires have been developed to assess subjective well-being (SWB). The vast majority of these assessment tools consisted of many items. The purpose of this study was to develop a short battery of five self-rating scales using only five statements to assess SWB: happiness, life satisfaction, mental health, physical health and religiosity.

Design/methodology/approach

A sample of Alexandria University students took part in this study (n = 11,468). They responded to the five self-rating scales.

Findings

The test–retest reliabilities of the self-rating scales ranged from 0.76 to 0.87, and the criterion-related validities ranged between 0.57 and 0.78, indicating acceptable to good coefficients. These rating scales had good convergent and factorial validity in two studies against the Oxford Happiness Inventory, the Satisfaction with Life Scale, the Love of Life Scale, the Arabic Scale of Mental Health and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem. Furthermore, the rating scales had good divergent and factorial validity against neuroticism. Using five samples, a principal components analysis extracted a single and high loaded factor, which was labeled “SWB.”

Research limitations/implications

This study used non-probability sample from one university.

Originality/value

The five self-rating scales are useful in positive psychology research when the available time for testing is short, as well as in epidemiological studies.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal