Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare lived recovery journeys in mental health with a recovery model.

Design/methodology/approach

Unstructured interviews with prompts were conducted with two individuals along with the lived experience of the researcher. The approach is autoethnographic and narrative.

Findings

The individuals followed recovery journeys after detention in secure psychiatric wards.

Research limitations/implications

This is a small-scale study. The results indicate it may be a useful research method elsewhere.

Practical implications

The study has relevance for clinical practice.

Social implications

The study highlights issues of social exclusion among those detained in secure mental health wards. The study gives voice to a marginalised community.

Originality/value

The interviewees and researcher have unique lived insight into forensic mental health care.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal