Internal control evaluation is a critical component of the overall audit process, mandated by auditing standards worldwide. These standards divide internal control structures into a number of elements, summarised as the control environment, information systems, and control procedures. Significant research exists as to auditors’ evaluations of internal controls. However, little work appears to consider the elements’ inter‐actions and relative significance. This study attempts to gauge the relative importance external auditors assign to the three elements. 94 practicing auditors evaluated internal control structures in two fictitious companies, one with strong internal control elements throughout, the other with one of the three set at a lower reliability level. The results indicate auditors consider control environment the most important element of internal control. The effect of weakening this element was that auditors assessed all three elements and overall evaluation as less reliable. Varying the other two elements did not have such significant effects. The findings carry ramifications for the auditing profession, particularly in drafting auditing standards on risk assessment.
Article navigation
1 July 2006
Research Article|
July 01 2006
The Relative Effects of Elements of Internal Control on Auditors’ Evaluations of Internal Control
Conor O’Leary;
Conor O’Leary
School of Accountancy, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Search for other works by this author on:
Errol Iselin;
Errol Iselin
Business School, Bond University, Gold Coast, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Divesh Sharma
Divesh Sharma
Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2041-5494
Print ISSN: 0114-0582
© Emerald Group Publishing Limited
2006
Pacific Accounting Review (2006) 18 (2): 69–96.
Citation
O’Leary C, Iselin E, Sharma D (2006), "The Relative Effects of Elements of Internal Control on Auditors’ Evaluations of Internal Control". Pacific Accounting Review, Vol. 18 No. 2 pp. 69–96, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/01140580610732822
Download citation file:
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Corporate governance mechanisms and audit delay in a joint audit regulation
Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance (July,2016)
Million dollar gamblers: a case of embezzlement in South Whitehall Township
Teaching Notes (July,2019)
Million dollar gamblers: a case of embezzlement in South Whitehall Township
The CASE Journal (June,2019)
Manipulation of earnings reports in Spain ‐ Some evidence
Journal of Applied Accounting Research (December,2007)
Related Chapters
A Simulation Study of the Influence of PCAOB Regulatory Guidance on the Internal Control Audit Process: An Analysis of Relationships, Risk and Information Sharing
Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting
Connecting Organizational Culture to Fraud: Buffer/Conduit Theory
Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research
A Comparative Study of the Whistleblowing Activities: Empirical Evidence from China, Taiwan, Russia, and the United States
Research on Professional Responsibility and Ethics in Accounting
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
