Despite the increasing evidence about the inappropriate use of medications by older people, there is very little published evidence about the control and monitoring of neuroleptic drugs used in nursing homes. As others have indicated, this is all the more worrying when set in the context of the paucity of research on nursing home care and the trend to replace registered nurses with untrained care assistants. In the United States, legislation in the form of the Nursing Home Reform Act (OBRA 1987) was introduced, in part, to regulate the prescribing and administration of neuroleptic (antipsychotic) drugs. No such legislation exists in Canada or the United Kingdom. In the case of the latter jurisdiction, the recent Royal Commission on Long‐Term Care for older people (The Stationery Office, 1999) has recommended a national care commission to monitor care, and set assessment and quality benchmarks. In Canada this debate has not even begun, and the purpose of this paper is not to ignite controversy, but to raise questions about the use of these drugs with nursing home residents. Voluntary guidelines and education of physicians, nurses and care attendants would be infinitely better than legislation. In the meantime, we need research to address the following questions: For what reasons should these drugs be given to older people? Are these drugs being used appropriately? Is the risk of side‐effects too great with these drugs? Are the numbers and type of staff employed in nursing homes adequate/qualified to detect and report side‐effects? How well do these drugs manage the behaviours they are given to control? Are they being used as chemical restraints or to make the older person compliant? Are the so‐called ‘atypical’ neuroleptic drugs any better? What we offer in this article is background information that might encourage others to not only review their practice but also to address these questions.
Article navigation
Review Article|
June 01 2001
Neuroleptic drug use in long‐term care: An inappropriate panacea? Available to Purchase
Brad Hagen;
Brad Hagen
School of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Christopher Armstrong‐Esther
Christopher Armstrong‐Esther
School of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
Publisher: Emerald Publishing
Online ISSN: 2042-8766
Print ISSN: 1471-7794
© MCB UP Limited
2001
Quality of Ageing (2001) 2 (2): 21–31.
Citation
Hagen B, Armstrong‐Esther C (2001), "Neuroleptic drug use in long‐term care: An inappropriate panacea?". Quality of Ageing, Vol. 2 No. 2 pp. 21–31, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14717794200100014
Download citation file:
149
Views
Suggested Reading
Promoting Resident and Family Councils: a pilot evaluation
Working with Older People (June,2016)
The INTERLINKS framework for long‐term care of older people in Europe
Journal of Integrated Care (June,2013)
Access to long-term care: perceptions and experiences of older Dutch people
Quality in Ageing and Older Adults (June,2015)
But does it work? The role of regulation in improving the quality of residential care for older people in Europe
Quality in Ageing and Older Adults (June,2015)
Analysis of antipsychotic drugs prescribing in incarcerated persons in a Serbian correctional facility
Int J Prison Health (2024) (December,2023)
Related Chapters
Exploring the Experiences of Family Caregivers of Older People in Residential Academic Campus of Higher Education in India
Race, Ethnicity, Gender and Other Social Characteristics as Factors in Health and Health Care Disparities
Improving Resident Outcomes in State Medicaid Nursing Facility Long-Term Care Programs: Augmenting CMS Surveys with Modest Changes to a Few State Program Features
Technology, Communication, Disparities and Government Options in Health and Health Care Services
The Direct Care Worker: Overcoming Definitions by Negation
Access to Care and Factors that Impact Access, Patients as Partners in Care and Changing Roles of Health Providers
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
