When ethnic conflict is likely people seek safety in homogenous neighborhoods, but does the resulting ethnic segregation decrease communal violence? This paper argues that local segregation causes violence by eroding interethnic trust. Although segregation reduces violent disputes between individuals, the possibility of positive interethnic contact is also lower in segregated areas. Where levels of interethnic trust are low, it is easier for political leaders and other extremists to build support for communal violence. I demonstrate that segregation increases the incidence of violence using a new data set measuring ethnic composition and violence across approximately 700 small localities in Kenya’s Rift Valley Province during Kenya’s 2007/2008 post-election crisis. Because segregation is likely endogenous to violence, I draw on Kenya’s history of land settlement to instrument for segregation. I also demonstrate that it is unlikely local segregation increases violence by increasing groups’ organizational capacity for violence.
Does Local Ethnic Segregation Lead to Violence?: Evidence from Kenya Available to Purchase
*I thank Kate Baldwin, Shigeo Hirano, Hino Hiroyuki, Macartan Humphreys, Saumitra Jha, Mbabazi Kasara, Bethany Lacina, Isabela Mares, Neelanjan Sircar, and seminar participants at Columbia University, Georgetown University, and the JICA Research Institute Conference on Ethnic Diversity and Economic Instability in Africa for helpful comments. Ayla Bonfiglio, Benjamin Clark, and Kate Redburn provided excellent research assistance and Eric Nyadimo, Jasper Mwenda, and G.O. Wayumbe advised on land registration and mapping. The Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy at Columbia University and the Hoover Institution at Stanford University provided research support.
Kasara K (2017), "Does Local Ethnic Segregation Lead to Violence?: Evidence from Kenya". Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Vol. 11 No. 4 pp. 411–470, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00014115
Download citation file:
