Special interest groups (SIGs) have multiple channels of influence: contributing to decision-makers or providing them with information (henceforth, inside lobbying) and grassroots mobilizations or advertising their position to voters (henceforth, outside lobbying). How do these channels interact? I study a signaling model in which a politician chooses the scope of a reform, two SIGs, one defending the status quo, the other pushing for change, use inside lobbying to bias the content of the proposed policy and outside lobbying to affect its fate. In equilibrium, inside lobbying expenditures are associated with policy compromises, a mark of influence of the SIG supportive of the status quo; meanwhile, outside lobbying activities are associated with comprehensive reforms, a sign of pro-change SIG power. I discuss how these findings can potentially inform the empirical research on SIG influence.
Article navigation
18 October 2021
Research Article|
October 18 2021
Lobbying, Inside and Out: How Special Interest Groups Influence Policy Choices Available to Purchase
Stephane Woltem
London School of Economics and Political Science
Houghton Street; London WC2A 2AE; UK
*For helpful comments, I thank Richard van Weelden, Scott Ashworth, Enghin Atalay, Christopher Berry, Ethan Bueno de Mesquita, Tiberiu Dragu, Marco Giani, Thomas Groll, Catherine Hafer, Will Howell, Navin Kartik, Dimitri Landa, Joseph McMurray, Pablo Montagnes, Antonio Nicolo, Laura Pilossoph, Giacomo Ponzetto, Carlo Prato, Francesco Squintani, Erik Snowberg, two anonymous reviewers, the editors, and conference and seminar participants at the 2016 Barcelona GSE Summer Forum, Caltech, the 2016 EEA Annual Meeting, the Harris School of Public Policy, Maynooth University, NYU, and Stanford. All remaining errors are the author’s responsibility.
Search for other works by this author on:
*For helpful comments, I thank Richard van Weelden, Scott Ashworth, Enghin Atalay, Christopher Berry, Ethan Bueno de Mesquita, Tiberiu Dragu, Marco Giani, Thomas Groll, Catherine Hafer, Will Howell, Navin Kartik, Dimitri Landa, Joseph McMurray, Pablo Montagnes, Antonio Nicolo, Laura Pilossoph, Giacomo Ponzetto, Carlo Prato, Francesco Squintani, Erik Snowberg, two anonymous reviewers, the editors, and conference and seminar participants at the 2016 Barcelona GSE Summer Forum, Caltech, the 2016 EEA Annual Meeting, the Harris School of Public Policy, Maynooth University, NYU, and Stanford. All remaining errors are the author’s responsibility.
Online ISSN: 1554-0634
Print ISSN: 1554-0626
© 2021 S. Wolton
2021
S. Wolton
Licensed re-use rights only
Quarterly Journal of Political Science (2021) 16 (4): 467–503.
Citation
Woltem S (2021), "Lobbying, Inside and Out: How Special Interest Groups Influence Policy Choices". Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Vol. 16 No. 4 pp. 467–503, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00020007
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Effects of power on negotiations: a comparison of collaborative versus competitive approach
International Journal of Conflict Management (August,2020)
Trust recovery tactics after double deviation: better sooner than later?
Journal of Service Management (August,2018)
Organising in the Face of Risk and Threat
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (April,2014)
Consumer responses to infectious disease cues: an integrative framework and research agenda
European Journal of Marketing (February,2025)
The impact of apologies and promises on post‐violation trust: The mediating role of interactional justice
International Journal of Conflict Management (June,2012)
Related Chapters
Opportunity, Threat, and Tactics: Collaboration and Confrontation by Latino Immigrant Challengers
Narratives of Identity in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change
Mobilizing in Response to Threat: The Case of the Ex-Gay Movement
Media, Movements, and Political Change
The Multidimensionality of Racial Threat: A Consideration of Its Affective Dimension
Advances in Group Processes
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
