The paper studies a simple voting system that can increase the power of minorities without sacrificing aggregate efficiency or treating voters asymmetrically. Storable votes grant each voter a stock of votes to spend as desired over a series of binary decisions and thus elicit voters’ strength of preferences. The potential of the mechanism is particularly clear in the presence of systematic minorities: by accumulating votes on issues that it deems most important, the minority can win occasionally. But because the majority typically can outvote it, the minority wins only if its strength of preference is high and the majority’s strength of preference is low. The result is that the minority’s preferences are represented, while aggregate efficiency either falls little or in fact rises, relative to simple majority voting. The theoretical predictions of our model are confirmed by a series of experiments: the frequency of minority victories, the relative payoff of the minority versus the majority, and the aggregate payoffs all match the theory.
Article navigation
29 July 2008
Research Article|
July 29 2008
Minorities and Storable Votes* Available to Purchase
Alessandra Casella;
Alessandra Casella
Columbia University
, Greqam, NBER, CEPR
Search for other works by this author on:
Raymond Riezman
Raymond Riezman
University of Iowa
, GEP, CES-ifo
Search for other works by this author on:
Online ISSN: 1554-0634
Print ISSN: 1554-0626
© 2007 A. Casella, T. Palfrey and R. Riezman
2007
A. Casella, T. Palfrey and R. Riezman
Licensed re-use rights only
Quarterly Journal of Political Science (2008) 3 (2): 165–200.
Citation
Casella A, Palfrey T, Riezman R (2008), "Minorities and Storable Votes*". Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Vol. 3 No. 2 pp. 165–200, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00007048
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Which food prices were more vulnerable to the COVID-19 blockade regulations in China? Comparison between perishable and storable vegetables
Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies (January,2022)
Making distinctions: reflections on learning, knowing and evaluating
Kybernetes (November,2014)
The impact of collective action and market prices: Evidence from an online agricultural discussion forum
Online Information Review (July,2019)
Improving Vegetable Production in Ukraine
British Food Journal (July,1993)
Thermal waste treatment for sustainable energy
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering Sustainability (September,2007)
Related Chapters
Do Service Firms Prefer Domestic Expansion despite Prior International Experience: The Case of Indian Software MNEs
Emerging Market Firms in the Global Economy
An Exploratory Study of the Role of Publishing Inventors in Nanotechnology
Understanding the Relationship Between Networks and Technology, Creativity and Innovation
Children's right to vote: The missing link in modern democracies
Structural, Historical, and Comparative Perspectives
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
