Lacking the informative feedback provided by competitive elections, an unfettered press and an active civil society, authoritarian regimes can find it difficult to identify which social groups have become dangerously discontented and to monitor lower levels of government. While a rise in public protest is often seen as a harbinger of regime collapse in such states, this paper uses a formal model and a close examination of the Chinese case to show that the informal toleration and even encouragement of small-scale, narrowly economic protests can be an effective information gathering tool, mitigating these informational problems. The analysis demonstrates that protests should be observed most frequently where discontent is neither too high nor too low. This calls into question the common assumption in comparative politics that an increase in protests necessarily reflects an increase in discontent or the weakness of a regime.
Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime*
I am grateful to Avηer Greif, John McMillan, Kevin O’Brien, Jean Oi, Robert Powell, Andrzej Skrzypacz, and Steven Tadelis as well as other classmates and seminar participants too numerous to mention for valuable discussions and guidance at various stages of this project. Financial support from the John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics at Stanford Law School and from the Center on Democracy, Development, and Rule of Law at the Freeman Spogli Institute of International Studies at Stanford University is gratefully acknowledged.
Lorentzen PL (2013), "Regularizing Rioting: Permitting Public Protest in an Authoritarian Regime*". Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Vol. 8 No. 2 pp. 127–158, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00012051
Download citation file:
