Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

The purpose of this paper explores whether cost audits as governance mechanism affected the trust of the users of financial statements and whether they provide the benefits intended by regulators.

Design/methodology/approach

The research method involved unstructured open‐ended face‐to‐face interviews with cost auditors in practice, mid‐ to high‐level accounts and finance executives of companies and investors. Twenty‐three interviews were conducted over a five‐week period from December 2004 to January 2005 in Kolkata city of India. The selection of respondents was purposive, to explore the attitudes of these three groups towards mandatory cost audit.

Findings

Mandatory cost audit in India has not enhanced the level of trust of investors and preparers of financial statements also have the opinion. It has not brought those benefits expected by regulators.

Research limitations/implications

It is suggested following the findings of this paper that future research should carefully consider the usefulness and cost and benefit aspects of the mandatory cost audit in India.

Originality/value

This is a pioneering study providing an in‐depth analysis of mandatory cost auditing in India.

You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$39.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal