Skip to Main Content
Article navigation
Purpose

This paper examines the value of relational focus groups as knowledge-making spaces in organization and management research. Empirically, we draw on a case study of hybrid focus groups (masterclasses for data collection and practice sharing), which explored 56 organizations' experiences of employing unemployed individuals in Australia.

Design/methodology/approach

Empirically, we draw on a case study of hybrid focus groups (masterclasses for data collection and practice sharing), which explored 56 organizations' experiences of employing unemployed individuals in Australia.

Findings

We identified four themes, evidenced by micro-excerpts of conversations: (1) Partial knowledge and collective claims; (2) Opacity in practice; (3) Misalignment and alterity; and (4) Relational focus groups as social interventions.

Research limitations/implications

The limitations of our research include sample self-selection, organizations already engaged in inclusion), Australian policy context, employer/intermediary mix, mostly online format and time-boundedness (tight labor markets), but we argue that the relational focus group method can cross temporal, spatial, sectors and spaces.

Practical implications

We provide practical recommendations for researchers, incorporating a conceptual model with three design tensions (structure → openness, data → relations and data collection → intervention), guiding principles and associated practices and a researcher's checklist.

Social implications

Drawing on our example of organizations' perspectives on inclusive hiring, we suggest that relational focus groups can lead to lasting communities of practice that contribute to broader social change and social justice.

Originality/value

Our contribution underscores that the value of relational focus groups is not to merely capture individual perspectives. Rather, they must be viewed as relational encounters in which participants' understandings are co-constituted intersubjectively and disrupted by alterity and dissonance. This reframes focus groups as a form of relational craft: a method in which knowledge emerges from sequential dialogue rather than being located within individual speakers ready for extraction according to prescribed patterns.

Licensed re-use rights only
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Purchased this content as a guest? Enter your email address to restore access.

Please enter valid email address.
Email address must be 94 characters or fewer.
Pay-Per-View Access
$41.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal