We analyze individuals’ demand for retirement plans under cumulative prospect theory (CPT), considering traditional and unit-linked annuities as well as innovative, unit-linked tontines, in which benefits depend on mortality and financial market risks. We find that the main parameters of CPT, subjective probabilities and loss aversion heavily affect individuals’ retirement income preferences, explaining why not sufficiently many individuals purchase traditional annuities. Subjective probabilities increase the attractiveness of risk-carrying retirement plans (like unit-linked annuities and tontines) and lead individuals to prefer such to traditional annuities, whereas loss aversion lowers the attractiveness of all retirement products and can lead individuals not to purchase any retirement plan.
Article navigation
6 November 2023
Research Article|
November 06 2023
Who Chooses Which Retirement Income? A CPT-based Analysis
An Chen;
An Chen
Institute of Insurance Science,
Ulm University
, Helmholtzstr. 20, 89069 Ulm, Germany
Search for other works by this author on:
Manuel Rach
Manuel Rach
Institute of Insurance Economics,
University of St. Gallen
, Tannenstrasse 19, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland
Search for other works by this author on:
*
We wish to thank two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions. The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Funding via departmental research funds. An Chen is grateful to FWO for financial support (project number FWO SBO S006721N). The authors are willing to share their data, analytics methods, and study materials with other researchers. The material will be available upon request.
Online ISSN: 2326-6201
Print ISSN: 2326-6198
© 2023 A. Chen and M. Rach
2023
A. Chen and M. Rach
Licensed re-use rights only
Review of Behavioral Economics (2023) 10 (3): 203–227.
Citation
Chen A, Rach M (2023), "Who Chooses Which Retirement Income? A CPT-based Analysis". Review of Behavioral Economics, Vol. 10 No. 3 pp. 203–227, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000173
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Optimal asset allocation in retirement planning: threshold-based utility maximization
Journal of Risk Finance (September,2021)
A qualitative investigation into financial well-being and social capital of retired government school teachers
Qualitative Research in Financial Markets (August,2024)
Ambiguity aversion and experiential learning: implications for long-term savings decisions
Review of Behavioral Finance (July,2020)
Preparing for retirement: the influence of message frame, message appeal and life stage
Journal of Social Marketing (July,2023)
Pensions and retirement systems research: a retrospective assessment from 1910 to 2022 using bibliometric analysis
Journal of Economic Studies (June,2023)
Related Chapters
Retirement Planning: A Literature Review
Contemporary Issues in Behavioral Finance
Musharakah Mutanaqisah Financing for Elderly Care: Integrating Financial Literacy for Sustainable Retirement in Malaysia
Islamic Finance and Corporate Governance: Synergies for Sustainable Growth
Retirement Planning by Maltese Nationals: A Study of Influential Factors
Contemporary Issues in Behavioral Finance
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
