The authors use a laboratory experiment to analyze the relationship between locus of control (LOC) and the behavior of a responding party in an asymmetric bargaining setting. The authors find that the availability of reward and punishment options to responders in bilateral ultimatum bargaining affects the behavior differently depending on their LOC type. Internal subjects are more likely to accept an offer when both reward and punishment options are available upon acceptance, therefore allowing them the largest range of possible payoff adjustments. Internal subjects are more likely to reward (and reward by larger amounts) when both options are available and are more likely to punish (and punish by larger amounts) when only the punishment option is available. The results suggest that the availability of more postacceptance instruments to affect payoffs, and thus a perception of greater control, promotes the acceptance decision of internal subjects.
Article navigation
27 April 2026
Research Article|
April 23 2026
Locus of control in reward and punishment decisions
Svetlana Pevnitskaya;
Faculty of Economics and Business Administration,
Vilnius University
, Berkeley, California, USA
Corresponding author Svetlana Pevnitskaya spevnitskaya@gmail.com
Search for other works by this author on:
Dmitry Ryvkin
Dmitry Ryvkin
School of Economics, Finance and Marketing,
RMIT University
, Melbourne, Australia
Search for other works by this author on:
Corresponding author Svetlana Pevnitskaya spevnitskaya@gmail.com
Received:
January 19 2025
Revision Received:
March 23 2025
Revision Received:
September 19 2025
Accepted:
October 23 2025
Online ISSN: 2326-6201
Print ISSN: 2326-6198
© 2026 Emerald Publishing Limited
2026
Emerald Publishing Limited
Licensed re-use rights only
Review of Behavioral Economics (2026) 13 (2): 318–337.
Article history
Received:
January 19 2025
Revision Received:
March 23 2025
Revision Received:
September 19 2025
Accepted:
October 23 2025
Citation
Pevnitskaya S, Ryvkin D (2026), "Locus of control in reward and punishment decisions". Review of Behavioral Economics, Vol. 13 No. 2 pp. 318–337, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RBE-01-2025-0249
Download citation file:
9
Views
New and popular articles
Suggested Reading
Determinants of older consumers’ interest in home equity conversion products
International Journal of Bank Marketing (April,2019)
Locus of control, psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation relation to performance
Journal of Managerial Psychology (May,2015)
How does service sabotage stimulate customer-oriented organizational citizenship behavior? The roles of guilt and locus of control
Journal of Services Marketing (September,2025)
Internals vs. externals: Who is impacted by ethical leadership?
Leadership & Organization Development Journal (August,2025)
Perceptual variables and intentions to start-up: a stochastic frontier analysis
Management Decision (June,2024)
Related Chapters
Recruiting Method and Its Impact on Participant Behavior
Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research
Service Encounter-Based
Knowledge Management in Tourism: Policy and Governance Applications
Behavior in Behavioral Strategy: Capturing, Measuring, Analyzing
Behavioral Strategy in Perspective
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
