When asking for donations, charitable organizations often suggest a potential amount to contribute. However, the evidence concerning the effects of such suggestions is scarce and inconsistent. Unlike the majority of earlier studies concerned with small-money solicitations, we examine the effect of larger nonbinding suggestions in the context of middle-range donations which are relevant in practice. In a randomized field experiment conducted in conjunction with the Bavarian State Opera, opera visitors received solicitation letters asking to support a social youth project organized by the opera house. The three different treatments were: no suggestion and suggestions of €100 and €200, respectively. Both suggestions were larger than average and median donations in this context. We find that suggested contribution levels substantially influence the distribution of donations actually received. The mean amounts given increase significantly if a suggestion is made. The increase is stronger in the €200 treatment. On the other hand, the participation rate decreases if a suggestion is made. Overall, the returns from the campaign increase nonsignificantly when a suggestion is made. The solicitation was repeated a year later, without any suggestion. There is weak evidence that suggestions have a long-term effect on individual contribution-level decisions.
Article navigation
27 May 2014
Research Article|
May 27 2014
Charitable Giving and Nonbinding Contribution-Level Suggestions — Evidence from a Field Experiment*
Steffen Huck;
Steffen Huck
WZB, Berlin, Germany and
UCL
, London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
Imran Rasul
Imran Rasul
UCL
, London, United Kingdom
Search for other works by this author on:
*
We thank all those at the Munich Opera House for making this project possible. This paper has been screened to ensure that no confidential information is revealed.
Online ISSN: 2326-6201
Print ISSN: 2326-6198
© 2014 M. Adena, S. Huck and I. Rasul
2014
M. Adena, S. Huck and I. Rasul
Licensed re-use rights only
Review of Behavioral Economics (2014) 1 (3): 209–221.
Citation
Adena M, Huck S, Rasul I (2014), "Charitable Giving and Nonbinding Contribution-Level Suggestions — Evidence from a Field Experiment*". Review of Behavioral Economics, Vol. 1 No. 3 pp. 209–221, doi: https://doi.org/10.1561/105.00000010
Download citation file:
Suggested Reading
Corporate responsibility coalitions and the sustainability issues management capabilities of firms
Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal (June,2022)
Working from home, job satisfaction and work–life balance – robust or heterogeneous links?
International Journal of Manpower (August,2020)
The mediating role of employee performance in the relationship between human resource management (HRM) practices and police service effectiveness
IIM Ranchi Journal of Management Studies (February,2024)
Determinants of charitable giving in Malaysia
Humanomics (November,2016)
Motives for corporate philanthropy and charitable causes supported
Journal of Strategy and Management (April,2021)
Related Chapters
Binding and nonbinding integration: the relational costs and rewards of social ties on mental health
Research in Community and Mental Health
Are Earnings Repatriation Elections under the 2004 American Jobs Creation Act Influenced by APB 23 Declarations?
Advances in Taxation
Commitment to Grand Challenges in Fluid Forms of Organizing: The Role of Narratives’ Temporality
Organizing for Societal Grand Challenges
Recommended for you
These recommendations are informed by your reading behaviors and indicated interests.
